Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners

Public institutions in Australia are subject to increasing statutory requirements to engage their communities, and consequently the number of practitioners has increased. These participatory and deliberative practitioners design, deliver, and evaluate democratic processes on behalf of public institu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Helen Christensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Westminster Press 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Deliberative Democracy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/615/
_version_ 1797985248521224192
author Helen Christensen
author_facet Helen Christensen
author_sort Helen Christensen
collection DOAJ
description Public institutions in Australia are subject to increasing statutory requirements to engage their communities, and consequently the number of practitioners has increased. These participatory and deliberative practitioners design, deliver, and evaluate democratic processes on behalf of public institutions. This article argues that the practitioner body has broadened, where different types of practitioners can now be identified in Australia. This broadening is the result of three main variables: (1) whether practitioners are employed by or contracted to public institutions; (2) whether they are engaged to work on projects with limited or considerable scope; and (3) whether they are focused on limited time frame processes or entire programs. Drawing on the results of a mixed method study, including survey and semi-structured interviews, this article explores the work contexts that shape the contemporary Australian practitioner, drawing lessons that can inform their practice in other contexts.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:15:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e3ed911bc544a01903cb55f4ced56ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2634-0488
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:15:17Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher University of Westminster Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Deliberative Democracy
spelling doaj.art-2e3ed911bc544a01903cb55f4ced56ab2022-12-22T04:38:01ZengUniversity of Westminster PressJournal of Deliberative Democracy2634-04882019-12-0115310.16997/jdd.343Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of PractitionersHelen Christensen0 Public institutions in Australia are subject to increasing statutory requirements to engage their communities, and consequently the number of practitioners has increased. These participatory and deliberative practitioners design, deliver, and evaluate democratic processes on behalf of public institutions. This article argues that the practitioner body has broadened, where different types of practitioners can now be identified in Australia. This broadening is the result of three main variables: (1) whether practitioners are employed by or contracted to public institutions; (2) whether they are engaged to work on projects with limited or considerable scope; and (3) whether they are focused on limited time frame processes or entire programs. Drawing on the results of a mixed method study, including survey and semi-structured interviews, this article explores the work contexts that shape the contemporary Australian practitioner, drawing lessons that can inform their practice in other contexts.https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/615/practitionersfacilitatorsprofessionalizationcommunity engagementpublic participation
spellingShingle Helen Christensen
Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners
Journal of Deliberative Democracy
practitioners
facilitators
professionalization
community engagement
public participation
title Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners
title_full Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners
title_fullStr Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners
title_short Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners
title_sort participatory and deliberative practitioners in australia how work context creates different types of practitioners
topic practitioners
facilitators
professionalization
community engagement
public participation
url https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/615/
work_keys_str_mv AT helenchristensen participatoryanddeliberativepractitionersinaustraliahowworkcontextcreatesdifferenttypesofpractitioners