Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners
Public institutions in Australia are subject to increasing statutory requirements to engage their communities, and consequently the number of practitioners has increased. These participatory and deliberative practitioners design, deliver, and evaluate democratic processes on behalf of public institu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Westminster Press
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Deliberative Democracy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/615/ |
_version_ | 1797985248521224192 |
---|---|
author | Helen Christensen |
author_facet | Helen Christensen |
author_sort | Helen Christensen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Public institutions in Australia are subject to increasing statutory requirements to engage their communities, and consequently the number of practitioners has increased. These participatory and deliberative practitioners design, deliver, and evaluate democratic processes on behalf of public institutions. This article argues that the practitioner body has broadened, where different types of practitioners can now be identified in Australia. This broadening is the result of three main variables: (1) whether practitioners are employed by or contracted to public institutions; (2) whether they are engaged to work on projects with limited or considerable scope; and (3) whether they are focused on limited time frame processes or entire programs. Drawing on the results of a mixed method study, including survey and semi-structured interviews, this article explores the work contexts that shape the contemporary Australian practitioner, drawing lessons that can inform their practice in other contexts. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:15:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2e3ed911bc544a01903cb55f4ced56ab |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2634-0488 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:15:17Z |
publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
publisher | University of Westminster Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Deliberative Democracy |
spelling | doaj.art-2e3ed911bc544a01903cb55f4ced56ab2022-12-22T04:38:01ZengUniversity of Westminster PressJournal of Deliberative Democracy2634-04882019-12-0115310.16997/jdd.343Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of PractitionersHelen Christensen0 Public institutions in Australia are subject to increasing statutory requirements to engage their communities, and consequently the number of practitioners has increased. These participatory and deliberative practitioners design, deliver, and evaluate democratic processes on behalf of public institutions. This article argues that the practitioner body has broadened, where different types of practitioners can now be identified in Australia. This broadening is the result of three main variables: (1) whether practitioners are employed by or contracted to public institutions; (2) whether they are engaged to work on projects with limited or considerable scope; and (3) whether they are focused on limited time frame processes or entire programs. Drawing on the results of a mixed method study, including survey and semi-structured interviews, this article explores the work contexts that shape the contemporary Australian practitioner, drawing lessons that can inform their practice in other contexts.https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/615/practitionersfacilitatorsprofessionalizationcommunity engagementpublic participation |
spellingShingle | Helen Christensen Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners Journal of Deliberative Democracy practitioners facilitators professionalization community engagement public participation |
title | Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners |
title_full | Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners |
title_fullStr | Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed | Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners |
title_short | Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners |
title_sort | participatory and deliberative practitioners in australia how work context creates different types of practitioners |
topic | practitioners facilitators professionalization community engagement public participation |
url | https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/615/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helenchristensen participatoryanddeliberativepractitionersinaustraliahowworkcontextcreatesdifferenttypesofpractitioners |