Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners
Public institutions in Australia are subject to increasing statutory requirements to engage their communities, and consequently the number of practitioners has increased. These participatory and deliberative practitioners design, deliver, and evaluate democratic processes on behalf of public institu...
Main Author: | Helen Christensen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Westminster Press
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Deliberative Democracy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/615/ |
Similar Items
-
Hospital doctors’ and general practitioners’ perspectives of outpatient discharge processes in Australia: an interpretive approach
by: Edwin Kruys, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Review of The Professionalization of Public Participation edited by Laurence Bherer, Mario Gauthier, and Louis Simard (New York: Routledge, 2017)
by: Helen E. Christensen
Published: (2018-06-01) -
The Policy Cycle: a framework for knowledge management of practitioners' expertise and role in participatory processes
by: Noella Edelmann, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRACTITIONER PROFILING FOR OCCUPATIONAL PROFESSIONALISATION, SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AND CONTINUOUS QUALITY ASSURANCE
by: Cornel Hart, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Practitioners’ views on community implementation of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the UK: a qualitative interview study
by: Joseph N.A Akanuwe, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)