Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG and CAG regimen alone. Methods: Comparison the effectiveness, overall survival and incidence of adverse reactions of 42 cases of MDS used decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen (deci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fan Zhenwei, Wang Xuan, Zhao Chunshan, Wang Wei, Yu Tingting
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:BIO Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20170801024
Description
Summary:Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG and CAG regimen alone. Methods: Comparison the effectiveness, overall survival and incidence of adverse reactions of 42 cases of MDS used decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen (decitabine 20mg/m2, once a day, d1-3, Accra neomycin 7mg/m2,intravenous injection, once a day, d4-7, cytarabine 10mg/m2, every 12 hours, d4-10, granulocyte colony stimulating factor 300μg, once a day, d4-10, white blood cell count>20×109/L when deactivated for four courses) and 48 patients in MDS were treated with chemotherapy alone CAG (Accra neomycin 14mg/m2,once a day, d1-3, cytarabine 10mg/m2, every 12 hours, d1-14, granulocyte colony stimulating factor 300μg, once a day, d1-14, white blood cell count>20×109/L when deactivated). Results: Compared with pure CAG, clinical efficacy of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen is better, the treatment does not increase the risk.
ISSN:2117-4458