Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG and CAG regimen alone. Methods: Comparison the effectiveness, overall survival and incidence of adverse reactions of 42 cases of MDS used decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen (deci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fan Zhenwei, Wang Xuan, Zhao Chunshan, Wang Wei, Yu Tingting
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:BIO Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20170801024
_version_ 1818661912898961408
author Fan Zhenwei
Wang Xuan
Zhao Chunshan
Wang Wei
Yu Tingting
author_facet Fan Zhenwei
Wang Xuan
Zhao Chunshan
Wang Wei
Yu Tingting
author_sort Fan Zhenwei
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG and CAG regimen alone. Methods: Comparison the effectiveness, overall survival and incidence of adverse reactions of 42 cases of MDS used decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen (decitabine 20mg/m2, once a day, d1-3, Accra neomycin 7mg/m2,intravenous injection, once a day, d4-7, cytarabine 10mg/m2, every 12 hours, d4-10, granulocyte colony stimulating factor 300μg, once a day, d4-10, white blood cell count>20×109/L when deactivated for four courses) and 48 patients in MDS were treated with chemotherapy alone CAG (Accra neomycin 14mg/m2,once a day, d1-3, cytarabine 10mg/m2, every 12 hours, d1-14, granulocyte colony stimulating factor 300μg, once a day, d1-14, white blood cell count>20×109/L when deactivated). Results: Compared with pure CAG, clinical efficacy of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen is better, the treatment does not increase the risk.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T04:52:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e622d3bc0c74ecf8c2be4c360c3b0bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2117-4458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T04:52:36Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series BIO Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-2e622d3bc0c74ecf8c2be4c360c3b0bd2022-12-21T22:02:51ZengEDP SciencesBIO Web of Conferences2117-44582017-01-0180102410.1051/bioconf/20170801024bioconf_icmsb2017_01024Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndromeFan Zhenwei0Wang Xuan1Zhao Chunshan2Wang Wei3Yu Tingting4College Nursing of Beihua UniversityHematology of Affiliated Hospital of Beihua UniversityCollege Nursing of Beihua UniversityHematology of Affiliated Hospital of Beihua UniversityHematology of Affiliated Hospital of Beihua UniversityObjective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG and CAG regimen alone. Methods: Comparison the effectiveness, overall survival and incidence of adverse reactions of 42 cases of MDS used decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen (decitabine 20mg/m2, once a day, d1-3, Accra neomycin 7mg/m2,intravenous injection, once a day, d4-7, cytarabine 10mg/m2, every 12 hours, d4-10, granulocyte colony stimulating factor 300μg, once a day, d4-10, white blood cell count>20×109/L when deactivated for four courses) and 48 patients in MDS were treated with chemotherapy alone CAG (Accra neomycin 14mg/m2,once a day, d1-3, cytarabine 10mg/m2, every 12 hours, d1-14, granulocyte colony stimulating factor 300μg, once a day, d1-14, white blood cell count>20×109/L when deactivated). Results: Compared with pure CAG, clinical efficacy of decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen is better, the treatment does not increase the risk.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20170801024
spellingShingle Fan Zhenwei
Wang Xuan
Zhao Chunshan
Wang Wei
Yu Tingting
Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
BIO Web of Conferences
title Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
title_full Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
title_short Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of CAG regimen with CAG regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
title_sort comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with half the amount of cag regimen with cag regimen alone in patients with inermediate to high risk myelodysplastic syndrome
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20170801024
work_keys_str_mv AT fanzhenwei comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendecitabinecombinedwithhalftheamountofcagregimenwithcagregimenaloneinpatientswithinermediatetohighriskmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT wangxuan comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendecitabinecombinedwithhalftheamountofcagregimenwithcagregimenaloneinpatientswithinermediatetohighriskmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT zhaochunshan comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendecitabinecombinedwithhalftheamountofcagregimenwithcagregimenaloneinpatientswithinermediatetohighriskmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT wangwei comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendecitabinecombinedwithhalftheamountofcagregimenwithcagregimenaloneinpatientswithinermediatetohighriskmyelodysplasticsyndrome
AT yutingting comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendecitabinecombinedwithhalftheamountofcagregimenwithcagregimenaloneinpatientswithinermediatetohighriskmyelodysplasticsyndrome