Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automatic volumetric measurement of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in testicular cancer (TC) patients treated with chemotherapy versus the standardized manual measurements based on RECIST criteria.21 TC patients w...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5230761?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1819182113722728448 |
---|---|
author | Çiğdem Öztürk Ton Velleman Alphons H H Bongaerts L M Bergman Robert J van Ginkel Jourik A Gietema Harald J Hoekstra |
author_facet | Çiğdem Öztürk Ton Velleman Alphons H H Bongaerts L M Bergman Robert J van Ginkel Jourik A Gietema Harald J Hoekstra |
author_sort | Çiğdem Öztürk |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automatic volumetric measurement of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in testicular cancer (TC) patients treated with chemotherapy versus the standardized manual measurements based on RECIST criteria.21 TC patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer were studied with a CT scan of chest and abdomen before and after cisplatin based chemotherapy. Three readers, a surgical resident, a radiological technician and a radiologist, assessed tumor response independently using computerized volumetric analysis with Vitrea software® and manual measurement according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1). Intra- and inter-rater variability were evaluated with intra class correlations and Bland-Altman analysis.Assessment of intra observer and inter observer variance proved non-significant in both measurement modalities. In particularly all intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the volumetric analysis were > .99 per observer and between observers. There was minimal bias in agreement for manual as well as volumetric analysis.In this study volumetric measurement using Vitrea software® appears to be a reliable, reproducible method to measure initial tumor volume of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer after chemotherapy. Both measurement methods can be performed by experienced non-radiologists as well. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T22:40:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2e6d6001e90b401189a829568255901c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T22:40:58Z |
publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-2e6d6001e90b401189a829568255901c2022-12-21T18:10:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01121e016897710.1371/journal.pone.0168977Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.Çiğdem ÖztürkTon VellemanAlphons H H BongaertsL M BergmanRobert J van GinkelJourik A GietemaHarald J HoekstraThe aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automatic volumetric measurement of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in testicular cancer (TC) patients treated with chemotherapy versus the standardized manual measurements based on RECIST criteria.21 TC patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer were studied with a CT scan of chest and abdomen before and after cisplatin based chemotherapy. Three readers, a surgical resident, a radiological technician and a radiologist, assessed tumor response independently using computerized volumetric analysis with Vitrea software® and manual measurement according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1). Intra- and inter-rater variability were evaluated with intra class correlations and Bland-Altman analysis.Assessment of intra observer and inter observer variance proved non-significant in both measurement modalities. In particularly all intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the volumetric analysis were > .99 per observer and between observers. There was minimal bias in agreement for manual as well as volumetric analysis.In this study volumetric measurement using Vitrea software® appears to be a reliable, reproducible method to measure initial tumor volume of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer after chemotherapy. Both measurement methods can be performed by experienced non-radiologists as well.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5230761?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Çiğdem Öztürk Ton Velleman Alphons H H Bongaerts L M Bergman Robert J van Ginkel Jourik A Gietema Harald J Hoekstra Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist. PLoS ONE |
title | Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist. |
title_full | Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist. |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist. |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist. |
title_short | Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist. |
title_sort | assessment of volumetric versus manual measurement in disseminated testicular cancer no difference in assessment between non radiologists and genitourinary radiologist |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5230761?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cigdemozturk assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist AT tonvelleman assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist AT alphonshhbongaerts assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist AT lmbergman assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist AT robertjvanginkel assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist AT jourikagietema assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist AT haraldjhoekstra assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist |