Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automatic volumetric measurement of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in testicular cancer (TC) patients treated with chemotherapy versus the standardized manual measurements based on RECIST criteria.21 TC patients w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Çiğdem Öztürk, Ton Velleman, Alphons H H Bongaerts, L M Bergman, Robert J van Ginkel, Jourik A Gietema, Harald J Hoekstra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5230761?pdf=render
_version_ 1819182113722728448
author Çiğdem Öztürk
Ton Velleman
Alphons H H Bongaerts
L M Bergman
Robert J van Ginkel
Jourik A Gietema
Harald J Hoekstra
author_facet Çiğdem Öztürk
Ton Velleman
Alphons H H Bongaerts
L M Bergman
Robert J van Ginkel
Jourik A Gietema
Harald J Hoekstra
author_sort Çiğdem Öztürk
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automatic volumetric measurement of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in testicular cancer (TC) patients treated with chemotherapy versus the standardized manual measurements based on RECIST criteria.21 TC patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer were studied with a CT scan of chest and abdomen before and after cisplatin based chemotherapy. Three readers, a surgical resident, a radiological technician and a radiologist, assessed tumor response independently using computerized volumetric analysis with Vitrea software® and manual measurement according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1). Intra- and inter-rater variability were evaluated with intra class correlations and Bland-Altman analysis.Assessment of intra observer and inter observer variance proved non-significant in both measurement modalities. In particularly all intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the volumetric analysis were > .99 per observer and between observers. There was minimal bias in agreement for manual as well as volumetric analysis.In this study volumetric measurement using Vitrea software® appears to be a reliable, reproducible method to measure initial tumor volume of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer after chemotherapy. Both measurement methods can be performed by experienced non-radiologists as well.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T22:40:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e6d6001e90b401189a829568255901c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T22:40:58Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2e6d6001e90b401189a829568255901c2022-12-21T18:10:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01121e016897710.1371/journal.pone.0168977Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.Çiğdem ÖztürkTon VellemanAlphons H H BongaertsL M BergmanRobert J van GinkelJourik A GietemaHarald J HoekstraThe aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automatic volumetric measurement of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in testicular cancer (TC) patients treated with chemotherapy versus the standardized manual measurements based on RECIST criteria.21 TC patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer were studied with a CT scan of chest and abdomen before and after cisplatin based chemotherapy. Three readers, a surgical resident, a radiological technician and a radiologist, assessed tumor response independently using computerized volumetric analysis with Vitrea software® and manual measurement according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1). Intra- and inter-rater variability were evaluated with intra class correlations and Bland-Altman analysis.Assessment of intra observer and inter observer variance proved non-significant in both measurement modalities. In particularly all intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the volumetric analysis were > .99 per observer and between observers. There was minimal bias in agreement for manual as well as volumetric analysis.In this study volumetric measurement using Vitrea software® appears to be a reliable, reproducible method to measure initial tumor volume of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of testicular cancer after chemotherapy. Both measurement methods can be performed by experienced non-radiologists as well.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5230761?pdf=render
spellingShingle Çiğdem Öztürk
Ton Velleman
Alphons H H Bongaerts
L M Bergman
Robert J van Ginkel
Jourik A Gietema
Harald J Hoekstra
Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.
PLoS ONE
title Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.
title_full Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.
title_fullStr Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.
title_short Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.
title_sort assessment of volumetric versus manual measurement in disseminated testicular cancer no difference in assessment between non radiologists and genitourinary radiologist
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5230761?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT cigdemozturk assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist
AT tonvelleman assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist
AT alphonshhbongaerts assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist
AT lmbergman assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist
AT robertjvanginkel assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist
AT jourikagietema assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist
AT haraldjhoekstra assessmentofvolumetricversusmanualmeasurementindisseminatedtesticularcancernodifferenceinassessmentbetweennonradiologistsandgenitourinaryradiologist