A novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertension

Rationale Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesised that pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) composite risk assessment scores could estimate perioperative risk for PH patients when adjusted for inherent procedural risk. Method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hussein J. Hassan, Traci Housten, Aparna Balasubramanian, Catherine E. Simpson, Rachel L. Damico, Stephen C. Mathai, Paul M. Hassoun, Jochen Steppan, Peter J. Leary, Todd M. Kolb
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Respiratory Society 2021-07-01
Series:ERJ Open Research
Online Access:http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00257-2021.full
_version_ 1818733638872727552
author Hussein J. Hassan
Traci Housten
Aparna Balasubramanian
Catherine E. Simpson
Rachel L. Damico
Stephen C. Mathai
Paul M. Hassoun
Jochen Steppan
Peter J. Leary
Todd M. Kolb
author_facet Hussein J. Hassan
Traci Housten
Aparna Balasubramanian
Catherine E. Simpson
Rachel L. Damico
Stephen C. Mathai
Paul M. Hassoun
Jochen Steppan
Peter J. Leary
Todd M. Kolb
author_sort Hussein J. Hassan
collection DOAJ
description Rationale Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesised that pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) composite risk assessment scores could estimate perioperative risk for PH patients when adjusted for inherent procedural risk. Methods We identified patients in the Johns Hopkins PH Center Registry that had noncardiac surgery (including endoscopies) between September 2015 and January 2020. We collected information on preoperative patient-level and procedural variables and used logistic regression to evaluate associations with a composite outcome of death within 30 days or serious postoperative complication. We generated composite patient-level risk assessment scores for each subject and used logistic regression to estimate the association with adverse surgical outcomes. We adjusted multivariable models for inherent procedural risk of major cardiovascular events and used these models to generate a numerical PH perioperative risk (PHPR) score. Results Among 150 subjects, 19 (12.7%) reached the primary outcome, including 7 deaths (4.7%). Individual patient-level and procedural variables were associated with the primary outcome (all p<0.05). A composite patient-level risk assessment score built on three noninvasive parameters was strongly associated with reduced risk for poor outcomes (OR=0.4, p=0.03). This association was strengthened after adjusting the model for procedural risk. A PHPR score derived from the multivariable model stratified patients into low (0%), intermediate (≤10%), or high (>10%) risk of reaching the primary outcome. Conclusion Composite PAH risk assessment scores can predict perioperative risk for PH patients after accounting for inherent procedural risk. Validation of the PHPR score in a multicentre, prospective cohort is warranted.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:52:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e789292d7b040519c02e159a979e49c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2312-0541
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:52:39Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format Article
series ERJ Open Research
spelling doaj.art-2e789292d7b040519c02e159a979e49c2022-12-21T21:28:09ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyERJ Open Research2312-05412021-07-017310.1183/23120541.00257-202100257-2021A novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertensionHussein J. Hassan0Traci Housten1Aparna Balasubramanian2Catherine E. Simpson3Rachel L. Damico4Stephen C. Mathai5Paul M. Hassoun6Jochen Steppan7Peter J. Leary8Todd M. Kolb9 Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Dept of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Dept of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Rationale Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesised that pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) composite risk assessment scores could estimate perioperative risk for PH patients when adjusted for inherent procedural risk. Methods We identified patients in the Johns Hopkins PH Center Registry that had noncardiac surgery (including endoscopies) between September 2015 and January 2020. We collected information on preoperative patient-level and procedural variables and used logistic regression to evaluate associations with a composite outcome of death within 30 days or serious postoperative complication. We generated composite patient-level risk assessment scores for each subject and used logistic regression to estimate the association with adverse surgical outcomes. We adjusted multivariable models for inherent procedural risk of major cardiovascular events and used these models to generate a numerical PH perioperative risk (PHPR) score. Results Among 150 subjects, 19 (12.7%) reached the primary outcome, including 7 deaths (4.7%). Individual patient-level and procedural variables were associated with the primary outcome (all p<0.05). A composite patient-level risk assessment score built on three noninvasive parameters was strongly associated with reduced risk for poor outcomes (OR=0.4, p=0.03). This association was strengthened after adjusting the model for procedural risk. A PHPR score derived from the multivariable model stratified patients into low (0%), intermediate (≤10%), or high (>10%) risk of reaching the primary outcome. Conclusion Composite PAH risk assessment scores can predict perioperative risk for PH patients after accounting for inherent procedural risk. Validation of the PHPR score in a multicentre, prospective cohort is warranted.http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00257-2021.full
spellingShingle Hussein J. Hassan
Traci Housten
Aparna Balasubramanian
Catherine E. Simpson
Rachel L. Damico
Stephen C. Mathai
Paul M. Hassoun
Jochen Steppan
Peter J. Leary
Todd M. Kolb
A novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertension
ERJ Open Research
title A novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_full A novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_fullStr A novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_full_unstemmed A novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_short A novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertension
title_sort novel approach to perioperative risk assessment for patients with pulmonary hypertension
url http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00257-2021.full
work_keys_str_mv AT husseinjhassan anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT tracihousten anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT aparnabalasubramanian anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT catherineesimpson anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT rachelldamico anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT stephencmathai anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT paulmhassoun anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT jochensteppan anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT peterjleary anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT toddmkolb anovelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT husseinjhassan novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT tracihousten novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT aparnabalasubramanian novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT catherineesimpson novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT rachelldamico novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT stephencmathai novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT paulmhassoun novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT jochensteppan novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT peterjleary novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT toddmkolb novelapproachtoperioperativeriskassessmentforpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension