Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality

The furnished cage is a new housing system for layers. A current trend in furnished cage design is to increase group size and replace the litter box with a mat provided with litter. An experiment was set up to determine the effects of group size and litter provision on laying performance and egg qua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Huneau-Salaün, M. Guinebretière, A. Taktak, D. Huonnic, V. Michel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2011-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731110002582
_version_ 1818906779834122240
author A. Huneau-Salaün
M. Guinebretière
A. Taktak
D. Huonnic
V. Michel
author_facet A. Huneau-Salaün
M. Guinebretière
A. Taktak
D. Huonnic
V. Michel
author_sort A. Huneau-Salaün
collection DOAJ
description The furnished cage is a new housing system for layers. A current trend in furnished cage design is to increase group size and replace the litter box with a mat provided with litter. An experiment was set up to determine the effects of group size and litter provision on laying performance and egg quality of beak-trimmed ISA Brown hens housed in large furnished cages with more than 12 hens. Six treatments, each of 18 furnished cages (768 cm2/hen including nest and litter area) were compared in a 3 × 2 experimental trial: three group sizes (S20 (20 hens per cage), S40 (40) and S60 (60)), with or without feed as litter distributed on the mat of the litter area. The provision of facilities per hen was equal in all treatments. Mortality, laying rate, mean egg weight, feed intake and feed conversion ratio were unaffected by group size over the 53-week laying period, and performance exceeded the ISA production standards. The overall percentage of eggs laid in the nest exceeded 95% except that it was slightly lower in group S20 (92.0% ± 6.4% v. S40: 96.0% ± 3.3% and S60: 96.2% ± 2.7%) leading to a higher proportion of dirty eggs (S20: 1.6% ± 2.2%, S40: 1.4% ± 1.5%, S60: 1.0% ± 1.0%). At 66 to 70 weeks, eggs laid outside the nest had a slightly higher count of mesophilic bacteria on the eggshell (5.0 log CFU/egg ± 0.4) than those laid in the nest (4.8 log CFU/egg ± 0.5) but no difference in contamination was observed between group sizes. Litter provision had no effect on mortality, egg weight or egg quality traits except for a higher proportion of broken eggs in cages with litter (5.3% ± 6.2% v. 4.6% ± 5.7%). Providing hens with feed for litter was associated with a higher laying rate (97.3% ± 3.2% v. 94.8% ± 4.4% at 23 weeks) and an apparent improvement in feed efficiency at the beginning of the laying period (feed conversion ratio based on feed consumption at the trough: 2.18 ± 0.06 with litter v. 2.28 ± 0.09 without litter at 25 weeks). The results of this study showed that a high level of productivity and good egg quality could be obtained in large furnished cages. Further research is needed to assess the impact on hens’ welfare and performance of using more economically competitive substrates than feed for litter.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:44:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e9c608717ed4e6987b34531f23d1e70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-7311
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:44:39Z
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj.art-2e9c608717ed4e6987b34531f23d1e702022-12-21T20:04:33ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112011-01-0156911917Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg qualityA. Huneau-Salaün0M. Guinebretière1A. Taktak2D. Huonnic3V. Michel4Anses-French Agency for food, Environmental and occupational health safety, BP 53 Route de Beaucemaine, 22440 Ploufragan, FranceAnses-French Agency for food, Environmental and occupational health safety, BP 53 Route de Beaucemaine, 22440 Ploufragan, FranceAnses-French Agency for food, Environmental and occupational health safety, BP 53 Route de Beaucemaine, 22440 Ploufragan, FranceAnses-French Agency for food, Environmental and occupational health safety, BP 53 Route de Beaucemaine, 22440 Ploufragan, FranceAnses-French Agency for food, Environmental and occupational health safety, BP 53 Route de Beaucemaine, 22440 Ploufragan, FranceThe furnished cage is a new housing system for layers. A current trend in furnished cage design is to increase group size and replace the litter box with a mat provided with litter. An experiment was set up to determine the effects of group size and litter provision on laying performance and egg quality of beak-trimmed ISA Brown hens housed in large furnished cages with more than 12 hens. Six treatments, each of 18 furnished cages (768 cm2/hen including nest and litter area) were compared in a 3 × 2 experimental trial: three group sizes (S20 (20 hens per cage), S40 (40) and S60 (60)), with or without feed as litter distributed on the mat of the litter area. The provision of facilities per hen was equal in all treatments. Mortality, laying rate, mean egg weight, feed intake and feed conversion ratio were unaffected by group size over the 53-week laying period, and performance exceeded the ISA production standards. The overall percentage of eggs laid in the nest exceeded 95% except that it was slightly lower in group S20 (92.0% ± 6.4% v. S40: 96.0% ± 3.3% and S60: 96.2% ± 2.7%) leading to a higher proportion of dirty eggs (S20: 1.6% ± 2.2%, S40: 1.4% ± 1.5%, S60: 1.0% ± 1.0%). At 66 to 70 weeks, eggs laid outside the nest had a slightly higher count of mesophilic bacteria on the eggshell (5.0 log CFU/egg ± 0.4) than those laid in the nest (4.8 log CFU/egg ± 0.5) but no difference in contamination was observed between group sizes. Litter provision had no effect on mortality, egg weight or egg quality traits except for a higher proportion of broken eggs in cages with litter (5.3% ± 6.2% v. 4.6% ± 5.7%). Providing hens with feed for litter was associated with a higher laying rate (97.3% ± 3.2% v. 94.8% ± 4.4% at 23 weeks) and an apparent improvement in feed efficiency at the beginning of the laying period (feed conversion ratio based on feed consumption at the trough: 2.18 ± 0.06 with litter v. 2.28 ± 0.09 without litter at 25 weeks). The results of this study showed that a high level of productivity and good egg quality could be obtained in large furnished cages. Further research is needed to assess the impact on hens’ welfare and performance of using more economically competitive substrates than feed for litter.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731110002582laying henfurnished cagegroup sizelitterperformance
spellingShingle A. Huneau-Salaün
M. Guinebretière
A. Taktak
D. Huonnic
V. Michel
Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality
Animal
laying hen
furnished cage
group size
litter
performance
title Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality
title_full Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality
title_fullStr Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality
title_full_unstemmed Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality
title_short Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality
title_sort furnished cages for laying hens study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location zootechnical performance and egg quality
topic laying hen
furnished cage
group size
litter
performance
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731110002582
work_keys_str_mv AT ahuneausalaun furnishedcagesforlayinghensstudyoftheeffectsofgroupsizeandlitterprovisiononlayinglocationzootechnicalperformanceandeggquality
AT mguinebretiere furnishedcagesforlayinghensstudyoftheeffectsofgroupsizeandlitterprovisiononlayinglocationzootechnicalperformanceandeggquality
AT ataktak furnishedcagesforlayinghensstudyoftheeffectsofgroupsizeandlitterprovisiononlayinglocationzootechnicalperformanceandeggquality
AT dhuonnic furnishedcagesforlayinghensstudyoftheeffectsofgroupsizeandlitterprovisiononlayinglocationzootechnicalperformanceandeggquality
AT vmichel furnishedcagesforlayinghensstudyoftheeffectsofgroupsizeandlitterprovisiononlayinglocationzootechnicalperformanceandeggquality