Bennet’s Criticism of Kant's Refutation of Theoretical Proofs for the Existence of God

Kant categorizes the arguments for the existence of God into ontological, cosmological, and design arguments. He holds that whereas existence is not a real and determining predicate, it is not allowed to be a part of object’s definition and so the ontological argument is fruitless. Along with Kant a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arvin Azargin
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Imam Sadiq University 2017-04-01
Series:پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
Subjects:
Online Access:https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1963_1d961a47e4ff858443a265fafeb6be96.pdf
_version_ 1797272271183675392
author Arvin Azargin
author_facet Arvin Azargin
author_sort Arvin Azargin
collection DOAJ
description Kant categorizes the arguments for the existence of God into ontological, cosmological, and design arguments. He holds that whereas existence is not a real and determining predicate, it is not allowed to be a part of object’s definition and so the ontological argument is fruitless. Along with Kant and Bennett, I shall try to show that existence is not a perfection nor a determining predicate. Besides, contrary to Bennett, who assesses Kant's reasoning insufficient, I argue that Kant finds the fallacy hidden in the argument and argues that the flaw of cosmological argument is its dependence on the insecure ontological argument. While Bennett truly notices the ambiguity and weakness of this relation, Kant, by appealing to a strong criticism, destructs the cosmological argument later. Finally, despite his interest in the argument from design, Kant asserts that it is based on the invalid cosmological argument. In this stage, Bennett criticism neglects the inherent connection between design and cosmological argument.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:25:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e9d20941787499fb39e3f8aaf3a1bb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2228-6578
2228-6586
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:25:58Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Imam Sadiq University
record_format Article
series پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
spelling doaj.art-2e9d20941787499fb39e3f8aaf3a1bb52024-03-06T08:03:09ZfasImam Sadiq Universityپژوهشنامه فلسفه دین2228-65782228-65862017-04-0115112210.30497/prr.2017.19631963Bennet’s Criticism of Kant's Refutation of Theoretical Proofs for the Existence of GodArvin Azargin0PhD student of philosophy, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.Kant categorizes the arguments for the existence of God into ontological, cosmological, and design arguments. He holds that whereas existence is not a real and determining predicate, it is not allowed to be a part of object’s definition and so the ontological argument is fruitless. Along with Kant and Bennett, I shall try to show that existence is not a perfection nor a determining predicate. Besides, contrary to Bennett, who assesses Kant's reasoning insufficient, I argue that Kant finds the fallacy hidden in the argument and argues that the flaw of cosmological argument is its dependence on the insecure ontological argument. While Bennett truly notices the ambiguity and weakness of this relation, Kant, by appealing to a strong criticism, destructs the cosmological argument later. Finally, despite his interest in the argument from design, Kant asserts that it is based on the invalid cosmological argument. In this stage, Bennett criticism neglects the inherent connection between design and cosmological argument.https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1963_1d961a47e4ff858443a265fafeb6be96.pdfkantbennettontological argumentcosmological argumentargument from design
spellingShingle Arvin Azargin
Bennet’s Criticism of Kant's Refutation of Theoretical Proofs for the Existence of God
پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
kant
bennett
ontological argument
cosmological argument
argument from design
title Bennet’s Criticism of Kant's Refutation of Theoretical Proofs for the Existence of God
title_full Bennet’s Criticism of Kant's Refutation of Theoretical Proofs for the Existence of God
title_fullStr Bennet’s Criticism of Kant's Refutation of Theoretical Proofs for the Existence of God
title_full_unstemmed Bennet’s Criticism of Kant's Refutation of Theoretical Proofs for the Existence of God
title_short Bennet’s Criticism of Kant's Refutation of Theoretical Proofs for the Existence of God
title_sort bennet s criticism of kant s refutation of theoretical proofs for the existence of god
topic kant
bennett
ontological argument
cosmological argument
argument from design
url https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1963_1d961a47e4ff858443a265fafeb6be96.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT arvinazargin bennetscriticismofkantsrefutationoftheoreticalproofsfortheexistenceofgod