Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens

A Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) land administration system strives for a more flexible, inclusive, participatory, affordable, reliable, realistic, and scalable approach to land administration and management in developing countries. The FFP finds itself thus at the interface with the coordination and governa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Evert Waeterloos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/534
_version_ 1797533598239162368
author Evert Waeterloos
author_facet Evert Waeterloos
author_sort Evert Waeterloos
collection DOAJ
description A Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) land administration system strives for a more flexible, inclusive, participatory, affordable, reliable, realistic, and scalable approach to land administration and management in developing countries. The FFP finds itself thus at the interface with the coordination and governance challenges of the mainstream promotion of democratic decentralization of the past decades in general, and collaborative systems for decentralized and participatory land governance in Africa, in particular. One recent example of such collaborative systems for decentralized land governance is the introduction in South Africa between 2015 and 2019 of District Land Reform Committees (DLRCs). We analyze this official experiment in collaborative land governance from a ‘system of innovation’ (SI) perspective. An adapted SI framework is developed and applied in three DLRCs. This study points out that for the innovation of collaboration to be effective, DLRCs require a firm operational and institutional backup. This is an important lead for the general discussion on inclusion, participation, and collaboration in FFP. We not only need these innovations to be well-supported and -resourced; they also require the explicit adoption of a systemic perspective in which various technical and social dimensions are interlinked.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:16:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2eac73fdf5a847c4ab23b7e784be2841
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:16:52Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-2eac73fdf5a847c4ab23b7e784be28412023-11-21T20:19:40ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-05-0110553410.3390/land10050534Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ LensEvert Waeterloos0Institute of Development Policy (IOB), University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, BelgiumA Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) land administration system strives for a more flexible, inclusive, participatory, affordable, reliable, realistic, and scalable approach to land administration and management in developing countries. The FFP finds itself thus at the interface with the coordination and governance challenges of the mainstream promotion of democratic decentralization of the past decades in general, and collaborative systems for decentralized and participatory land governance in Africa, in particular. One recent example of such collaborative systems for decentralized land governance is the introduction in South Africa between 2015 and 2019 of District Land Reform Committees (DLRCs). We analyze this official experiment in collaborative land governance from a ‘system of innovation’ (SI) perspective. An adapted SI framework is developed and applied in three DLRCs. This study points out that for the innovation of collaboration to be effective, DLRCs require a firm operational and institutional backup. This is an important lead for the general discussion on inclusion, participation, and collaboration in FFP. We not only need these innovations to be well-supported and -resourced; they also require the explicit adoption of a systemic perspective in which various technical and social dimensions are interlinked.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/534land governance reformcapacity developmentFit-for-Purpose land administration (FFP)institutional frameworks
spellingShingle Evert Waeterloos
Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens
Land
land governance reform
capacity development
Fit-for-Purpose land administration (FFP)
institutional frameworks
title Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens
title_full Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens
title_fullStr Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens
title_full_unstemmed Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens
title_short Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens
title_sort introducing collaborative governance in decentralized land administration and management in south africa district land reform committees viewed through a system of innovation lens
topic land governance reform
capacity development
Fit-for-Purpose land administration (FFP)
institutional frameworks
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/5/534
work_keys_str_mv AT evertwaeterloos introducingcollaborativegovernanceindecentralizedlandadministrationandmanagementinsouthafricadistrictlandreformcommitteesviewedthroughasystemofinnovationlens