QOL Evaluation of Nab-Paclitaxel and Docetaxel for Early Breast Cancer

Objective: A previous randomized phase II study showed that neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) 100 mg/m2) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer, compared with docetaxel (DTX). We evaluated patient outcomes in terms of the Functional Assessment of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiromi Okuyama, Seigo Nakamura, Sadako Akashi-Tanaka, Terumasa Sawada, Takashi Kuwayama, Satoko Handa, Yasuhisa Kato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Publishing House 2018-10-01
Series:European Journal of Breast Health
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.eurjbreasthealth.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/qol-evaluation-of-nab-paclitaxel-and-docetaxel-for/42023
_version_ 1797916138497114112
author Hiromi Okuyama
Seigo Nakamura
Sadako Akashi-Tanaka
Terumasa Sawada
Takashi Kuwayama
Satoko Handa
Yasuhisa Kato
author_facet Hiromi Okuyama
Seigo Nakamura
Sadako Akashi-Tanaka
Terumasa Sawada
Takashi Kuwayama
Satoko Handa
Yasuhisa Kato
author_sort Hiromi Okuyama
collection DOAJ
description Objective: A previous randomized phase II study showed that neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) 100 mg/m2) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer, compared with docetaxel (DTX). We evaluated patient outcomes in terms of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), as a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL).Materials and Methods: Stage I–III HER2-negative breast cancer patients from the previous study were included. They received either four cycles of nab-PTX (100 mg/m2 days 1/8/15) every 4 weeks, or DTX (75 mg/m2 day 1) every 3 weeks, both followed by four cycles of 5-fluorouracil/ epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC). Patients completed a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire at baseline, after one and four cycles of taxanes, before administration of FEC, and after administration of one and four cycles of FEC.Results: Thirty-six eligible patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. FACT-B scores at baseline and after four cycles of taxanes were 115/108 (DTX/nab-PTX) and 99/92, respectively. There were no significant differences between DTX and nab-PTX for FACT-B, FACT-B-Trial Outcome Index (FACT-B-TOI) and FACT-General. FACT-B and FACT-B TOI scores tended to decrease after one cycle and after four cycles of chemotherapy which did not recover to the baseline scores through the end of chemotherapy in each group.Conclusion: There were no significant safety differences between nab-PTX and DTX. HRQoL tended to decrease during taxane-based anticancer treatment, with no significant differences between the treatments. We suggest that the HRQoL questionnaire has limited ability to evaluate different chemotherapy schedules. Trial registration UMIN000009855. Nov 20, 2012 registered.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T12:52:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2eae8b50c1884c4e9fe02f8df11abfb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2587-0831
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T12:52:30Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Galenos Publishing House
record_format Article
series European Journal of Breast Health
spelling doaj.art-2eae8b50c1884c4e9fe02f8df11abfb52023-02-15T16:13:39ZengGalenos Publishing HouseEuropean Journal of Breast Health2587-08312018-10-0114419419810.5152/ejbh.2018.417413049054QOL Evaluation of Nab-Paclitaxel and Docetaxel for Early Breast CancerHiromi Okuyama0Seigo Nakamura1Sadako Akashi-Tanaka2Terumasa Sawada3Takashi Kuwayama4Satoko Handa5Yasuhisa Kato6 Division of Drug Information Analytics, Department of Drug Information, Showa University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Division of Drug Information Analytics, Department of Drug Information, Showa University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan Division of Drug Information Analytics, Department of Drug Information, Showa University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan Objective: A previous randomized phase II study showed that neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) 100 mg/m2) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer, compared with docetaxel (DTX). We evaluated patient outcomes in terms of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), as a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL).Materials and Methods: Stage I–III HER2-negative breast cancer patients from the previous study were included. They received either four cycles of nab-PTX (100 mg/m2 days 1/8/15) every 4 weeks, or DTX (75 mg/m2 day 1) every 3 weeks, both followed by four cycles of 5-fluorouracil/ epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC). Patients completed a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire at baseline, after one and four cycles of taxanes, before administration of FEC, and after administration of one and four cycles of FEC.Results: Thirty-six eligible patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. FACT-B scores at baseline and after four cycles of taxanes were 115/108 (DTX/nab-PTX) and 99/92, respectively. There were no significant differences between DTX and nab-PTX for FACT-B, FACT-B-Trial Outcome Index (FACT-B-TOI) and FACT-General. FACT-B and FACT-B TOI scores tended to decrease after one cycle and after four cycles of chemotherapy which did not recover to the baseline scores through the end of chemotherapy in each group.Conclusion: There were no significant safety differences between nab-PTX and DTX. HRQoL tended to decrease during taxane-based anticancer treatment, with no significant differences between the treatments. We suggest that the HRQoL questionnaire has limited ability to evaluate different chemotherapy schedules. Trial registration UMIN000009855. Nov 20, 2012 registered. http://www.eurjbreasthealth.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/qol-evaluation-of-nab-paclitaxel-and-docetaxel-for/42023 breast cancer therapyside effectquality of lifepatient support system
spellingShingle Hiromi Okuyama
Seigo Nakamura
Sadako Akashi-Tanaka
Terumasa Sawada
Takashi Kuwayama
Satoko Handa
Yasuhisa Kato
QOL Evaluation of Nab-Paclitaxel and Docetaxel for Early Breast Cancer
European Journal of Breast Health
breast cancer therapy
side effect
quality of life
patient support system
title QOL Evaluation of Nab-Paclitaxel and Docetaxel for Early Breast Cancer
title_full QOL Evaluation of Nab-Paclitaxel and Docetaxel for Early Breast Cancer
title_fullStr QOL Evaluation of Nab-Paclitaxel and Docetaxel for Early Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed QOL Evaluation of Nab-Paclitaxel and Docetaxel for Early Breast Cancer
title_short QOL Evaluation of Nab-Paclitaxel and Docetaxel for Early Breast Cancer
title_sort qol evaluation of nab paclitaxel and docetaxel for early breast cancer
topic breast cancer therapy
side effect
quality of life
patient support system
url http://www.eurjbreasthealth.com/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/qol-evaluation-of-nab-paclitaxel-and-docetaxel-for/42023
work_keys_str_mv AT hiromiokuyama qolevaluationofnabpaclitaxelanddocetaxelforearlybreastcancer
AT seigonakamura qolevaluationofnabpaclitaxelanddocetaxelforearlybreastcancer
AT sadakoakashitanaka qolevaluationofnabpaclitaxelanddocetaxelforearlybreastcancer
AT terumasasawada qolevaluationofnabpaclitaxelanddocetaxelforearlybreastcancer
AT takashikuwayama qolevaluationofnabpaclitaxelanddocetaxelforearlybreastcancer
AT satokohanda qolevaluationofnabpaclitaxelanddocetaxelforearlybreastcancer
AT yasuhisakato qolevaluationofnabpaclitaxelanddocetaxelforearlybreastcancer