The asymmetric effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on carbon emissions in OECD: new evidence from non-linear panel ARDL model

The level of economic income, population density and sources of energy supply is critical in assessing environmental quality. Recent empirical studies paid limited attention to the role of renewable (RE) and fossil energy (NRE) supply in carbon pollution regarding the Environmental Kuznets Hypothesi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Devran Şanlı, Yusuf Muratoğlu, Mehmet Songur, Erginbay Uğurlu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1228296/full
_version_ 1797783779392094208
author Devran Şanlı
Yusuf Muratoğlu
Mehmet Songur
Erginbay Uğurlu
author_facet Devran Şanlı
Yusuf Muratoğlu
Mehmet Songur
Erginbay Uğurlu
author_sort Devran Şanlı
collection DOAJ
description The level of economic income, population density and sources of energy supply is critical in assessing environmental quality. Recent empirical studies paid limited attention to the role of renewable (RE) and fossil energy (NRE) supply in carbon pollution regarding the Environmental Kuznets Hypothesis (EKC). Therefore, this study investigates the asymmetric relationships between carbon emissions and energy sources on the one hand and the environmental Kuznets hypothesis on the other hand for OECD countries, comprising countries with significant renewable energy supplies. The study includes the annual data from 1990 to 2021 and performs panel non-linear ARDL regression. The empirical results clearly show that RE and NRE have asymmetric effects on emissions in the long run but not in the short run. Both positive and negative shocks in RE reduce CO2 emissions in OECD economies, while asymmetric shocks in NRE substantially increase them. Increasing RE supply is clearly effective in reducing emissions. However, unlike most previous studies, this study shows that RE does not significantly reduce CO2 emissions in OECD countries. The error correction term (ect.) in the NARDL model is negative and significant. The magnitude of the term indicates that the system will return to long-term equilibrium about 4.2 years after any shock. Furthermore, we show that the EKC Hypothesis is supported in OECD countries. The turning point of the EKC is at $4085.77 per capita. Besides, regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and Augmented Mean Group (AMG) estimator approach were used for robustness checks. The findings from the robustness check are consistent with the NARDL findings. Policies based on the promotion of a low-carbon and sustainable green environment should place greater emphasis on renewable resources even in OECD countries. Moreover, while many studies in the literature address asymmetric effects and EKC as energy consumption or utilisation, the novelty of this study is that it approaches the issue regarding energy supply with asymmetric effects for RE and NRE.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:31:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2eb2698d5c46471bbfd96a140edd2a80
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-665X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:31:42Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
spelling doaj.art-2eb2698d5c46471bbfd96a140edd2a802023-07-10T12:48:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2023-07-011110.3389/fenvs.2023.12282961228296The asymmetric effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on carbon emissions in OECD: new evidence from non-linear panel ARDL modelDevran Şanlı0Yusuf Muratoğlu1Mehmet Songur2Erginbay Uğurlu3Department of Economics, Bartın University, Bartın, TurkiyeDepartment of Economics, Hitit University, Çorum, TurkiyeDepartment of Economics, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, TurkiyeDepartment of Economics and Finance, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, TurkiyeThe level of economic income, population density and sources of energy supply is critical in assessing environmental quality. Recent empirical studies paid limited attention to the role of renewable (RE) and fossil energy (NRE) supply in carbon pollution regarding the Environmental Kuznets Hypothesis (EKC). Therefore, this study investigates the asymmetric relationships between carbon emissions and energy sources on the one hand and the environmental Kuznets hypothesis on the other hand for OECD countries, comprising countries with significant renewable energy supplies. The study includes the annual data from 1990 to 2021 and performs panel non-linear ARDL regression. The empirical results clearly show that RE and NRE have asymmetric effects on emissions in the long run but not in the short run. Both positive and negative shocks in RE reduce CO2 emissions in OECD economies, while asymmetric shocks in NRE substantially increase them. Increasing RE supply is clearly effective in reducing emissions. However, unlike most previous studies, this study shows that RE does not significantly reduce CO2 emissions in OECD countries. The error correction term (ect.) in the NARDL model is negative and significant. The magnitude of the term indicates that the system will return to long-term equilibrium about 4.2 years after any shock. Furthermore, we show that the EKC Hypothesis is supported in OECD countries. The turning point of the EKC is at $4085.77 per capita. Besides, regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and Augmented Mean Group (AMG) estimator approach were used for robustness checks. The findings from the robustness check are consistent with the NARDL findings. Policies based on the promotion of a low-carbon and sustainable green environment should place greater emphasis on renewable resources even in OECD countries. Moreover, while many studies in the literature address asymmetric effects and EKC as energy consumption or utilisation, the novelty of this study is that it approaches the issue regarding energy supply with asymmetric effects for RE and NRE.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1228296/fullcarbon emissionsrenewable energynon-renewable energyenvironmental kuznets curvenon-linear panel
spellingShingle Devran Şanlı
Yusuf Muratoğlu
Mehmet Songur
Erginbay Uğurlu
The asymmetric effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on carbon emissions in OECD: new evidence from non-linear panel ARDL model
Frontiers in Environmental Science
carbon emissions
renewable energy
non-renewable energy
environmental kuznets curve
non-linear panel
title The asymmetric effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on carbon emissions in OECD: new evidence from non-linear panel ARDL model
title_full The asymmetric effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on carbon emissions in OECD: new evidence from non-linear panel ARDL model
title_fullStr The asymmetric effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on carbon emissions in OECD: new evidence from non-linear panel ARDL model
title_full_unstemmed The asymmetric effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on carbon emissions in OECD: new evidence from non-linear panel ARDL model
title_short The asymmetric effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on carbon emissions in OECD: new evidence from non-linear panel ARDL model
title_sort asymmetric effect of renewable and non renewable energy on carbon emissions in oecd new evidence from non linear panel ardl model
topic carbon emissions
renewable energy
non-renewable energy
environmental kuznets curve
non-linear panel
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1228296/full
work_keys_str_mv AT devransanlı theasymmetriceffectofrenewableandnonrenewableenergyoncarbonemissionsinoecdnewevidencefromnonlinearpanelardlmodel
AT yusufmuratoglu theasymmetriceffectofrenewableandnonrenewableenergyoncarbonemissionsinoecdnewevidencefromnonlinearpanelardlmodel
AT mehmetsongur theasymmetriceffectofrenewableandnonrenewableenergyoncarbonemissionsinoecdnewevidencefromnonlinearpanelardlmodel
AT erginbayugurlu theasymmetriceffectofrenewableandnonrenewableenergyoncarbonemissionsinoecdnewevidencefromnonlinearpanelardlmodel
AT devransanlı asymmetriceffectofrenewableandnonrenewableenergyoncarbonemissionsinoecdnewevidencefromnonlinearpanelardlmodel
AT yusufmuratoglu asymmetriceffectofrenewableandnonrenewableenergyoncarbonemissionsinoecdnewevidencefromnonlinearpanelardlmodel
AT mehmetsongur asymmetriceffectofrenewableandnonrenewableenergyoncarbonemissionsinoecdnewevidencefromnonlinearpanelardlmodel
AT erginbayugurlu asymmetriceffectofrenewableandnonrenewableenergyoncarbonemissionsinoecdnewevidencefromnonlinearpanelardlmodel