Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers

A split-valuation method is developed and implemented to elicit the willingness to pay to consume- or avoid consuming- a product of ambiguous quality. The split-valuation method uses experimental auction markets to separate and value the positive and negative attributes of the ambiguous good. The re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian L. Buhr, Dermot J. Hayes, Jason F. Shogren, James B. Kliebenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Agricultural Economics Association 1993-12-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30963
_version_ 1818032811955716096
author Brian L. Buhr
Dermot J. Hayes
Jason F. Shogren
James B. Kliebenstein
author_facet Brian L. Buhr
Dermot J. Hayes
Jason F. Shogren
James B. Kliebenstein
author_sort Brian L. Buhr
collection DOAJ
description A split-valuation method is developed and implemented to elicit the willingness to pay to consume- or avoid consuming- a product of ambiguous quality. The split-valuation method uses experimental auction markets to separate and value the positive and negative attributes of the ambiguous good. The results show that the method can be used to successfully value a good ambiguous quality. Our application reveals that for a sample of students at a midwestern land-grant institution, the average respondent is willing to pay a premium for meat produced with the use of a genetically engineered growth enhancer that has 30% to 60% fewer calories and is 10% to 20% leaner.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:13:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2eb5a7e6c6a64213977a9196e142e579
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1068-5502
2327-8285
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:13:19Z
publishDate 1993-12-01
publisher Western Agricultural Economics Association
record_format Article
series Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
spelling doaj.art-2eb5a7e6c6a64213977a9196e142e5792022-12-22T01:59:30ZengWestern Agricultural Economics AssociationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1068-55022327-82851993-12-0118217518410.22004/ag.econ.3096330963Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth EnhancersBrian L. BuhrDermot J. HayesJason F. ShogrenJames B. KliebensteinA split-valuation method is developed and implemented to elicit the willingness to pay to consume- or avoid consuming- a product of ambiguous quality. The split-valuation method uses experimental auction markets to separate and value the positive and negative attributes of the ambiguous good. The results show that the method can be used to successfully value a good ambiguous quality. Our application reveals that for a sample of students at a midwestern land-grant institution, the average respondent is willing to pay a premium for meat produced with the use of a genetically engineered growth enhancer that has 30% to 60% fewer calories and is 10% to 20% leaner.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30963ambiguityexperimental economicsgrowth hormonesvaluationvickrey auction
spellingShingle Brian L. Buhr
Dermot J. Hayes
Jason F. Shogren
James B. Kliebenstein
Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
ambiguity
experimental economics
growth hormones
valuation
vickrey auction
title Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers
title_full Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers
title_fullStr Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers
title_full_unstemmed Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers
title_short Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers
title_sort valuing ambiguity the case of genetically engineered growth enhancers
topic ambiguity
experimental economics
growth hormones
valuation
vickrey auction
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30963
work_keys_str_mv AT brianlbuhr valuingambiguitythecaseofgeneticallyengineeredgrowthenhancers
AT dermotjhayes valuingambiguitythecaseofgeneticallyengineeredgrowthenhancers
AT jasonfshogren valuingambiguitythecaseofgeneticallyengineeredgrowthenhancers
AT jamesbkliebenstein valuingambiguitythecaseofgeneticallyengineeredgrowthenhancers