Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines

Nowadays, a multitude of scientific publications on health science are being developed that require correct bibliographic search in order to avoid the use and inclusion of retracted literature in them. The use of these articles could directly affect the consistency of the scientific studies and coul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Pastor-Ramón, Ivan Herrera-Peco, Oskia Agirre, María García-Puente, José María Morán
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/12/5/34
_version_ 1797466167997104128
author Elena Pastor-Ramón
Ivan Herrera-Peco
Oskia Agirre
María García-Puente
José María Morán
author_facet Elena Pastor-Ramón
Ivan Herrera-Peco
Oskia Agirre
María García-Puente
José María Morán
author_sort Elena Pastor-Ramón
collection DOAJ
description Nowadays, a multitude of scientific publications on health science are being developed that require correct bibliographic search in order to avoid the use and inclusion of retracted literature in them. The use of these articles could directly affect the consistency of the scientific studies and could affect clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the capacity of the main scientific literature search engines, both general (Gooogle Scholar) and scientific (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), used in health sciences in order to check their ability to detect and warn users of retracted articles in the searches carried out. The sample of retracted articles was obtained from RetractionWatch. The results showed that although Google Scholar was the search engine with the highest capacity to retrieve selected articles, it was the least effective, compared with scientific search engines, at providing information on the retraction of articles. The use of different scientific search engines to retrieve as many scientific articles as possible, as well as never using only a generic search engine, is highly recommended. This will reduce the possibility of including retracted articles and will avoid affecting the reliability of the scientific studies carried out.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:32:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2ec481da02294008af32836594c1f9b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2174-8144
2254-9625
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:32:57Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
spelling doaj.art-2ec481da02294008af32836594c1f9b52023-11-24T07:22:16ZengMDPI AGEuropean Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education2174-81442254-96252022-05-0112545846410.3390/ejihpe12050034Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search EnginesElena Pastor-Ramón0Ivan Herrera-Peco1Oskia Agirre2María García-Puente3José María Morán4Virtual Health Sciences Library of the Balearic Islands (Bibliosalut), 07120 Palma, SpainFaculty of Communication, Pompeu Fabra University, 08018 Barcelona, SpainPublic Health and Paharmacy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, 28621 Madrid, SpainFundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040 Madrid, SpainMetabolic Bone Diseases Research Group, Nursing Department, Nursing and Occupational Therapy College, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, SpainNowadays, a multitude of scientific publications on health science are being developed that require correct bibliographic search in order to avoid the use and inclusion of retracted literature in them. The use of these articles could directly affect the consistency of the scientific studies and could affect clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the capacity of the main scientific literature search engines, both general (Gooogle Scholar) and scientific (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), used in health sciences in order to check their ability to detect and warn users of retracted articles in the searches carried out. The sample of retracted articles was obtained from RetractionWatch. The results showed that although Google Scholar was the search engine with the highest capacity to retrieve selected articles, it was the least effective, compared with scientific search engines, at providing information on the retraction of articles. The use of different scientific search engines to retrieve as many scientific articles as possible, as well as never using only a generic search engine, is highly recommended. This will reduce the possibility of including retracted articles and will avoid affecting the reliability of the scientific studies carried out.https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/12/5/34research methodologybiomedical publishingpublication ethicsscientific misconductretraction of publication
spellingShingle Elena Pastor-Ramón
Ivan Herrera-Peco
Oskia Agirre
María García-Puente
José María Morán
Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines
European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
research methodology
biomedical publishing
publication ethics
scientific misconduct
retraction of publication
title Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines
title_full Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines
title_fullStr Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines
title_full_unstemmed Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines
title_short Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines
title_sort improving the reliability of literature reviews detection of retracted articles through academic search engines
topic research methodology
biomedical publishing
publication ethics
scientific misconduct
retraction of publication
url https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/12/5/34
work_keys_str_mv AT elenapastorramon improvingthereliabilityofliteraturereviewsdetectionofretractedarticlesthroughacademicsearchengines
AT ivanherrerapeco improvingthereliabilityofliteraturereviewsdetectionofretractedarticlesthroughacademicsearchengines
AT oskiaagirre improvingthereliabilityofliteraturereviewsdetectionofretractedarticlesthroughacademicsearchengines
AT mariagarciapuente improvingthereliabilityofliteraturereviewsdetectionofretractedarticlesthroughacademicsearchengines
AT josemariamoran improvingthereliabilityofliteraturereviewsdetectionofretractedarticlesthroughacademicsearchengines