The Effect of 24/7, Digital-First, NHS Primary Care on Acute Hospital Spending: Retrospective Observational Analysis
BackgroundDigital health has the potential to revolutionize health care by improving accessibility, patient experience, outcomes, productivity, safety, and cost efficiency. In England, the NHS (National Health Service) Long Term Plan promised the right to access digital-first...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2021-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2021/7/e24917 |
| _version_ | 1797735856690167808 |
|---|---|
| author | Sam Winward Tejal Patel Mazin Al-Saffar Matthew Noble |
| author_facet | Sam Winward Tejal Patel Mazin Al-Saffar Matthew Noble |
| author_sort | Sam Winward |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundDigital health has the potential to revolutionize health care by improving accessibility, patient experience, outcomes, productivity, safety, and cost efficiency. In England, the NHS (National Health Service) Long Term Plan promised the right to access digital-first primary care by March 31, 2024. However, there are few global, fully digital-first providers and limited research into their effects on cost from a health system perspective.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of highly accessible, digital-first primary care on acute hospital spending.
MethodsA retrospective, observational analysis compared acute hospital spending on patients registered to a 24/7, digital-first model of NHS primary care with that on patients registered to all other practices in North West London Collaboration of Clinical Commissioning Groups. Acute hospital spending data per practice were obtained under a freedom of information request. Three versions of NHS techniques designed to fairly allocate funding according to need were used to standardize or “weight” the practice populations; hence, there are 3 results for each year. The weighting adjusted the populations for characteristics that impact health care spending, such as age, sex, and deprivation. The total spending was divided by the number of standardized or weighted patients to give the spending per weighted patient, which was used to compare the 2 groups in the NHS financial years (FY) 2018-2019 (FY18/19) and 2019-2020 (FY19/20). FY18/19 costs were adjusted for inflation, so they were comparable with the values of FY19/20.
ResultsThe NHS spending on acute hospital care for 2.43 million and 2.54 million people (FY18/19 and FY19/20) across 358 practices and 49 primary care networks was £1.6 billion and £1.65 billion (a currency exchange rate of £1=US $1.38 is applicable), respectively. The spending on acute care per weighted patient for Babylon GP at Hand members was 12%, 31%, and 54% (£93, P=.047; £223, P<.001; and £389, P<.001) lower than the regional average in FY18/19 for the 3 weighting methodologies used. In FY19/20, it was 15%, 35%, and 51% (£114, P=.006; £246, P<.001; and £362, P<.001) lower. This amounted to lower costs for the Babylon GP at Hand population of £1.37, £4.40 million, and £11.6 million, respectively, in FY18/19; and £3.26 million, £9.54 million, and £18.8 million, respectively, in FY19/20.
ConclusionsPatients with access to 24/7, digital-first primary care incurred significantly lower acute hospital costs. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:05:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2ecd19b3f8394a1f8f69efd6015a86a7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1438-8871 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:05:10Z |
| publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-2ecd19b3f8394a1f8f69efd6015a86a72023-08-28T17:07:07ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712021-07-01237e2491710.2196/24917The Effect of 24/7, Digital-First, NHS Primary Care on Acute Hospital Spending: Retrospective Observational AnalysisSam Winwardhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6067-8452Tejal Patelhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7356-7054Mazin Al-Saffarhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0454-8754Matthew Noblehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1174-186X BackgroundDigital health has the potential to revolutionize health care by improving accessibility, patient experience, outcomes, productivity, safety, and cost efficiency. In England, the NHS (National Health Service) Long Term Plan promised the right to access digital-first primary care by March 31, 2024. However, there are few global, fully digital-first providers and limited research into their effects on cost from a health system perspective. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of highly accessible, digital-first primary care on acute hospital spending. MethodsA retrospective, observational analysis compared acute hospital spending on patients registered to a 24/7, digital-first model of NHS primary care with that on patients registered to all other practices in North West London Collaboration of Clinical Commissioning Groups. Acute hospital spending data per practice were obtained under a freedom of information request. Three versions of NHS techniques designed to fairly allocate funding according to need were used to standardize or “weight” the practice populations; hence, there are 3 results for each year. The weighting adjusted the populations for characteristics that impact health care spending, such as age, sex, and deprivation. The total spending was divided by the number of standardized or weighted patients to give the spending per weighted patient, which was used to compare the 2 groups in the NHS financial years (FY) 2018-2019 (FY18/19) and 2019-2020 (FY19/20). FY18/19 costs were adjusted for inflation, so they were comparable with the values of FY19/20. ResultsThe NHS spending on acute hospital care for 2.43 million and 2.54 million people (FY18/19 and FY19/20) across 358 practices and 49 primary care networks was £1.6 billion and £1.65 billion (a currency exchange rate of £1=US $1.38 is applicable), respectively. The spending on acute care per weighted patient for Babylon GP at Hand members was 12%, 31%, and 54% (£93, P=.047; £223, P<.001; and £389, P<.001) lower than the regional average in FY18/19 for the 3 weighting methodologies used. In FY19/20, it was 15%, 35%, and 51% (£114, P=.006; £246, P<.001; and £362, P<.001) lower. This amounted to lower costs for the Babylon GP at Hand population of £1.37, £4.40 million, and £11.6 million, respectively, in FY18/19; and £3.26 million, £9.54 million, and £18.8 million, respectively, in FY19/20. ConclusionsPatients with access to 24/7, digital-first primary care incurred significantly lower acute hospital costs.https://www.jmir.org/2021/7/e24917 |
| spellingShingle | Sam Winward Tejal Patel Mazin Al-Saffar Matthew Noble The Effect of 24/7, Digital-First, NHS Primary Care on Acute Hospital Spending: Retrospective Observational Analysis Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| title | The Effect of 24/7, Digital-First, NHS Primary Care on Acute Hospital Spending: Retrospective Observational Analysis |
| title_full | The Effect of 24/7, Digital-First, NHS Primary Care on Acute Hospital Spending: Retrospective Observational Analysis |
| title_fullStr | The Effect of 24/7, Digital-First, NHS Primary Care on Acute Hospital Spending: Retrospective Observational Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of 24/7, Digital-First, NHS Primary Care on Acute Hospital Spending: Retrospective Observational Analysis |
| title_short | The Effect of 24/7, Digital-First, NHS Primary Care on Acute Hospital Spending: Retrospective Observational Analysis |
| title_sort | effect of 24 7 digital first nhs primary care on acute hospital spending retrospective observational analysis |
| url | https://www.jmir.org/2021/7/e24917 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT samwinward theeffectof247digitalfirstnhsprimarycareonacutehospitalspendingretrospectiveobservationalanalysis AT tejalpatel theeffectof247digitalfirstnhsprimarycareonacutehospitalspendingretrospectiveobservationalanalysis AT mazinalsaffar theeffectof247digitalfirstnhsprimarycareonacutehospitalspendingretrospectiveobservationalanalysis AT matthewnoble theeffectof247digitalfirstnhsprimarycareonacutehospitalspendingretrospectiveobservationalanalysis AT samwinward effectof247digitalfirstnhsprimarycareonacutehospitalspendingretrospectiveobservationalanalysis AT tejalpatel effectof247digitalfirstnhsprimarycareonacutehospitalspendingretrospectiveobservationalanalysis AT mazinalsaffar effectof247digitalfirstnhsprimarycareonacutehospitalspendingretrospectiveobservationalanalysis AT matthewnoble effectof247digitalfirstnhsprimarycareonacutehospitalspendingretrospectiveobservationalanalysis |