Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive?
Today, there is a clear need in developing a unified theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for all areas of legal practice and legal doctrine. Despite the existence of several models within either general argumentation theory or multiple judicial-reasoning doctrines, none of them can be us...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Studia Iuridica Lublinensia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/12897 |
| _version_ | 1797937090171764736 |
|---|---|
| author | Tamara Dudash |
| author_facet | Tamara Dudash |
| author_sort | Tamara Dudash |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Today, there is a clear need in developing a unified theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for all areas of legal practice and legal doctrine. Despite the existence of several models within either general argumentation theory or multiple judicial-reasoning doctrines, none of them can be used as a universal tool for studies of legal argumentation. The aim of this article is to suggest a theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for analysis of legal argumentation not only in judicial reasoning but also in other areas, e.g., law making, law application, or law interpretation. The subject matter of this article is a theoretical model of legal argumentation as a universal multidisciplinary theoretical basis for legal argumentation analysis. The theoretical model of legal argumentation encompasses an argumentative situation, a body of legal arguing, instruments of legal arguing and argumentation, a reconstruction and an evaluation of legal argumentation. In its turn, the body of legal arguing includes: parties of legal arguing, a subject of legal arguing, and a content of legal arguing. The instruments of legal arguing include legal and other arguments, argument schemes, argumentation structures, and rules of legal argumentation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T18:39:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2ecf30d8c81b405990c4a4aafa2d198d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1731-6375 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T18:39:20Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | Maria Curie-Skłodowska University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Iuridica Lublinensia |
| spelling | doaj.art-2ecf30d8c81b405990c4a4aafa2d198d2023-02-01T17:42:17ZengMaria Curie-Skłodowska UniversityStudia Iuridica Lublinensia1731-63752022-09-013138510310.17951/sil.2022.31.3.85-1039655Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive?Tamara Dudash0Ivan Franko National University of LvivToday, there is a clear need in developing a unified theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for all areas of legal practice and legal doctrine. Despite the existence of several models within either general argumentation theory or multiple judicial-reasoning doctrines, none of them can be used as a universal tool for studies of legal argumentation. The aim of this article is to suggest a theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for analysis of legal argumentation not only in judicial reasoning but also in other areas, e.g., law making, law application, or law interpretation. The subject matter of this article is a theoretical model of legal argumentation as a universal multidisciplinary theoretical basis for legal argumentation analysis. The theoretical model of legal argumentation encompasses an argumentative situation, a body of legal arguing, instruments of legal arguing and argumentation, a reconstruction and an evaluation of legal argumentation. In its turn, the body of legal arguing includes: parties of legal arguing, a subject of legal arguing, and a content of legal arguing. The instruments of legal arguing include legal and other arguments, argument schemes, argumentation structures, and rules of legal argumentation.https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/12897legal arguinglegal argumentationtheoretical model of legal argumentationbody of legal arguinginstruments of legal arguingreconstruction and evaluation of legal argumentation |
| spellingShingle | Tamara Dudash Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive? Studia Iuridica Lublinensia legal arguing legal argumentation theoretical model of legal argumentation body of legal arguing instruments of legal arguing reconstruction and evaluation of legal argumentation |
| title | Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive? |
| title_full | Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive? |
| title_fullStr | Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive? |
| title_short | Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive? |
| title_sort | analyzing legal argumentation what theoretical model is the most comprehensive |
| topic | legal arguing legal argumentation theoretical model of legal argumentation body of legal arguing instruments of legal arguing reconstruction and evaluation of legal argumentation |
| url | https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/12897 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tamaradudash analyzinglegalargumentationwhattheoreticalmodelisthemostcomprehensive |