Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive?
Today, there is a clear need in developing a unified theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for all areas of legal practice and legal doctrine. Despite the existence of several models within either general argumentation theory or multiple judicial-reasoning doctrines, none of them can be us...
Main Author: | Tamara Dudash |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Studia Iuridica Lublinensia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/12897 |
Similar Items
-
In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation
by: John Biro, et al.
Published: (2008-02-01) -
Reviewing Argument Schemes for Legal Arguments of Statutory Interpretation
by: Eduardo Brandão Nunes
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Theory, logic and interdisciplinarity in legal argumentation
by: José David Paredes Sandoval
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Facing Aggressiveness in Face-to-Face Arguing
by: Iryna Khomenko, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Speaking, Inferring, Arguing. On the Argumentative Character of Speech
by: Cristina Corredor
Published: (2020-12-01)