A systematic review of effective quality feedback measurement tools used in clinical skills assessment [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a valid tool to assess the clinical skills of medical students. Feedback after OSCE is essential for student improvement and safe clinical practice. Many examiners do not provide helpful or insightful feedback in the text space provided...
Main Authors: | Micheál Newell, Davina Li Xin Ling, Thomas Kropmans, Akram Alsahafi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2023-06-01
|
Series: | MedEdPublish |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://mededpublish.org/articles/12-11/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Social influence and external feedback control in humans [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Mario Gollwitzer, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Social influence and external feedback control in humans [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Mario Gollwitzer, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in a hybrid digital / in-person training for hormonal IUD in Nigeria: findings and applications of the approach [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Funmilola OlaOlorun, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs
by: Julia Sader, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
“Shadow” OSCE examiner. A cross-sectional study comparing the “shadow” examiner with the original OSCE examiner format
by: Marcelo Arlindo Vasconcelos Rodrigues, et al.