The effect of Magnesium sulfate on reducing Propofol injection pain in elective surgeries

Background: Propofol, an anesthetic noted to give rapid recovery, causes discomfort at the site of injection. A number of methods to reduce propofol-induced pain have been tried, including pretreatment with lidocaine, with varying results. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of magnesium sulfate compared...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shoaybi G, Soltanimohammadi S, Rajabi M
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2007-06-01
Series:Tehran University Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3651.pdf&manuscript_id=3651
_version_ 1811265789767974912
author Shoaybi G
Soltanimohammadi S
Rajabi M
author_facet Shoaybi G
Soltanimohammadi S
Rajabi M
author_sort Shoaybi G
collection DOAJ
description Background: Propofol, an anesthetic noted to give rapid recovery, causes discomfort at the site of injection. A number of methods to reduce propofol-induced pain have been tried, including pretreatment with lidocaine, with varying results. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of magnesium sulfate compared to that of lidocaine and normal saline in mitigating propofol-induced pain. Methods: One hundred ASA I and II adults, aged 20-50 years, scheduled for elective surgery requiring two IV lines with 20-gauge cannulae in the dorsum of each hand, were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly placed into two groups of 50 patients. In each patient, one hand was the case study and other hand was the control. Group A received 10% magnesium sulfate in one hand and normal saline in the other hand. Group B received 10% magnesium sulfate in one hand and 1% lidocaine in the other hand. All injections had a volume of 2 ml. After 30 seconds, 2 cc of 1% propofol was injected simultaneously into each hand. Pain was assessed according to the VAS rating system, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the most severe pain), with a minimum interval of 3 as significant pain. Data were analyzed by chi-square and independent t tests. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: In Group A, the mean pain in the hand premedicated with magnesium was 1.46±1.07, compared to 4.54±2.15 for that of the other hand that had received normal saline (P=0.001). In group B, the mean pain in the hand that had received magnesium was 0.82±1.34, compared to 0.78±1.07 for that of the other hand, which had received lidocaine (P=0.86). Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium and lidocaine pretreatments are equally effective in attenuating propofol-induced pain, and were better than normal saline in attenuating propofol-induced pain.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:30:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2ee4e4066d36469896276646d2436303
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1683-1764
1735-7322
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:30:17Z
publishDate 2007-06-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Tehran University Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-2ee4e4066d36469896276646d24363032022-12-22T03:17:44ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesTehran University Medical Journal1683-17641735-73222007-06-016523034The effect of Magnesium sulfate on reducing Propofol injection pain in elective surgeriesShoaybi GSoltanimohammadi SRajabi MBackground: Propofol, an anesthetic noted to give rapid recovery, causes discomfort at the site of injection. A number of methods to reduce propofol-induced pain have been tried, including pretreatment with lidocaine, with varying results. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of magnesium sulfate compared to that of lidocaine and normal saline in mitigating propofol-induced pain. Methods: One hundred ASA I and II adults, aged 20-50 years, scheduled for elective surgery requiring two IV lines with 20-gauge cannulae in the dorsum of each hand, were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly placed into two groups of 50 patients. In each patient, one hand was the case study and other hand was the control. Group A received 10% magnesium sulfate in one hand and normal saline in the other hand. Group B received 10% magnesium sulfate in one hand and 1% lidocaine in the other hand. All injections had a volume of 2 ml. After 30 seconds, 2 cc of 1% propofol was injected simultaneously into each hand. Pain was assessed according to the VAS rating system, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the most severe pain), with a minimum interval of 3 as significant pain. Data were analyzed by chi-square and independent t tests. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: In Group A, the mean pain in the hand premedicated with magnesium was 1.46±1.07, compared to 4.54±2.15 for that of the other hand that had received normal saline (P=0.001). In group B, the mean pain in the hand that had received magnesium was 0.82±1.34, compared to 0.78±1.07 for that of the other hand, which had received lidocaine (P=0.86). Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium and lidocaine pretreatments are equally effective in attenuating propofol-induced pain, and were better than normal saline in attenuating propofol-induced pain.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3651.pdf&manuscript_id=3651IV injection-induced pain
spellingShingle Shoaybi G
Soltanimohammadi S
Rajabi M
The effect of Magnesium sulfate on reducing Propofol injection pain in elective surgeries
Tehran University Medical Journal
IV injection-induced pain
title The effect of Magnesium sulfate on reducing Propofol injection pain in elective surgeries
title_full The effect of Magnesium sulfate on reducing Propofol injection pain in elective surgeries
title_fullStr The effect of Magnesium sulfate on reducing Propofol injection pain in elective surgeries
title_full_unstemmed The effect of Magnesium sulfate on reducing Propofol injection pain in elective surgeries
title_short The effect of Magnesium sulfate on reducing Propofol injection pain in elective surgeries
title_sort effect of magnesium sulfate on reducing propofol injection pain in elective surgeries
topic IV injection-induced pain
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/3651.pdf&manuscript_id=3651
work_keys_str_mv AT shoaybig theeffectofmagnesiumsulfateonreducingpropofolinjectionpaininelectivesurgeries
AT soltanimohammadis theeffectofmagnesiumsulfateonreducingpropofolinjectionpaininelectivesurgeries
AT rajabim theeffectofmagnesiumsulfateonreducingpropofolinjectionpaininelectivesurgeries
AT shoaybig effectofmagnesiumsulfateonreducingpropofolinjectionpaininelectivesurgeries
AT soltanimohammadis effectofmagnesiumsulfateonreducingpropofolinjectionpaininelectivesurgeries
AT rajabim effectofmagnesiumsulfateonreducingpropofolinjectionpaininelectivesurgeries