Examining how study teams manage different viewpoints and priorities in patient‐centered outcomes research: Results of an embedded multiple case study
Abstract Introduction Limited evidence exists about which patient and stakeholder engagement practices support or hinder study teams as they negotiate different viewpoints in decisions about the design and conduct of patient‐centered outcomes research. Methods We applied a multiple‐embedded descript...
Main Authors: | Maureen E. Maurer, Tandrea Hilliard‐Boone, Karen Frazier, Laura Forsythe, Rachel Mosbacher, Kristin L. Carman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-08-01
|
Series: | Health Expectations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13765 |
Similar Items
-
Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
by: Anna Maria Chudyk, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Patient and public involvement in stroke research: a scoping review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Julianne Hickey, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study
by: Anna Maria Chudyk, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review
by: Christiane Grill
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers
by: Anna Maria Chudyk, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)