Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification Scale

System justification (SJ) is an important construct in social psychology that has received considerable attention over the past three decades. At the empirical level, system justification is examined by means of a specially developed System Justification Scale (SJS), which is designed to explain how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jiri Remr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/9/131
_version_ 1797580441094455296
author Jiri Remr
author_facet Jiri Remr
author_sort Jiri Remr
collection DOAJ
description System justification (SJ) is an important construct in social psychology that has received considerable attention over the past three decades. At the empirical level, system justification is examined by means of a specially developed System Justification Scale (SJS), which is designed to explain how individuals accept justice, whether they consider a given social order to be fair, how they evaluate the conditions in the country in which they live, how they accept social change, or to what extent they express compliance with established rules. System justification involves not only those who benefit from the existing social order, but also those who are disadvantaged. In their case, system justification mitigates negative perceptions of objective inequalities and asymmetries. Empirical evidence suggests that system justification may also be associated with higher perceived quality of life. The present study translated and validated the SJS, providing complex and detailed information on the psychometric properties of the scale. In addition, the scale’s internal consistency, unidimensionality, and construct validity were examined. The conclusions presented are based on the results of exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency assessment, analysis of variance, correlation analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results were obtained from face-to-face survey data collected from a sample of 1419 individuals representing the Czech population aged 18–79 years. Since the SJS showed high internal consistency, adequately discriminated levels of system justification, and had robust psychometric properties, it could be recommended for further use.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:50:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2eec1e10d5384afb895a053f8866317b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2174-8144
2254-9625
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:50:58Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
spelling doaj.art-2eec1e10d5384afb895a053f8866317b2023-11-19T10:20:21ZengMDPI AGEuropean Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education2174-81442254-96252023-09-011391801181410.3390/ejihpe13090131Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification ScaleJiri Remr0INESAN (Institute for Evaluations and Social Analyses), Sokolovská 351/25, 18600 Prague, Czech RepublicSystem justification (SJ) is an important construct in social psychology that has received considerable attention over the past three decades. At the empirical level, system justification is examined by means of a specially developed System Justification Scale (SJS), which is designed to explain how individuals accept justice, whether they consider a given social order to be fair, how they evaluate the conditions in the country in which they live, how they accept social change, or to what extent they express compliance with established rules. System justification involves not only those who benefit from the existing social order, but also those who are disadvantaged. In their case, system justification mitigates negative perceptions of objective inequalities and asymmetries. Empirical evidence suggests that system justification may also be associated with higher perceived quality of life. The present study translated and validated the SJS, providing complex and detailed information on the psychometric properties of the scale. In addition, the scale’s internal consistency, unidimensionality, and construct validity were examined. The conclusions presented are based on the results of exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency assessment, analysis of variance, correlation analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results were obtained from face-to-face survey data collected from a sample of 1419 individuals representing the Czech population aged 18–79 years. Since the SJS showed high internal consistency, adequately discriminated levels of system justification, and had robust psychometric properties, it could be recommended for further use.https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/9/131system justificationpsychometricsCFAvalidityrule compliancesocial inequalities
spellingShingle Jiri Remr
Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification Scale
European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
system justification
psychometrics
CFA
validity
rule compliance
social inequalities
title Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification Scale
title_full Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification Scale
title_fullStr Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification Scale
title_full_unstemmed Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification Scale
title_short Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification Scale
title_sort assessing system justification in czech population using the system justification scale
topic system justification
psychometrics
CFA
validity
rule compliance
social inequalities
url https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/9/131
work_keys_str_mv AT jiriremr assessingsystemjustificationinczechpopulationusingthesystemjustificationscale