Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States
Background: Prenatal exposure to drinking water with arsenic concentrations >50 μg/L is associated with adverse birth outcomes, with inconclusive evidence for concentrations ≤50 μg/L. In a collaborative effort by public health experts, hydrologists, and geologists, we used published machine learn...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Environment International |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412022001027 |
_version_ | 1811299782938853376 |
---|---|
author | Catherine M. Bulka Molly Scannell Bryan Melissa A. Lombard Scott M. Bartell Daniel K. Jones Paul M. Bradley Veronica M. Vieira Debra T. Silverman Michael Focazio Patricia L. Toccalino Johnni Daniel Lorraine C. Backer Joseph D. Ayotte Matthew O. Gribble Maria Argos |
author_facet | Catherine M. Bulka Molly Scannell Bryan Melissa A. Lombard Scott M. Bartell Daniel K. Jones Paul M. Bradley Veronica M. Vieira Debra T. Silverman Michael Focazio Patricia L. Toccalino Johnni Daniel Lorraine C. Backer Joseph D. Ayotte Matthew O. Gribble Maria Argos |
author_sort | Catherine M. Bulka |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Prenatal exposure to drinking water with arsenic concentrations >50 μg/L is associated with adverse birth outcomes, with inconclusive evidence for concentrations ≤50 μg/L. In a collaborative effort by public health experts, hydrologists, and geologists, we used published machine learning model estimates to characterize arsenic concentrations in private wells—federally unregulated for drinking water contaminants—and evaluated associations with birth outcomes throughout the conterminous U.S. Methods: Using several machine learning models, including boosted regression trees (BRT) and random forest classification (RFC), developed from measured groundwater arsenic concentrations of ∼20,000 private wells, we characterized the probability that arsenic concentrations occurred within specific ranges in groundwater. Probabilistic model estimates and private well usage data were linked by county to all live birth certificates from 2016 (n = 3.6 million). We evaluated associations with gestational age and term birth weight using mixed-effects models, adjusted for potential confounders and incorporated random intercepts for spatial clustering. Results: We generally observed inverse associations with term birth weight. For instance, when using BRT estimates, a 10-percentage point increase in the probability that private well arsenic concentrations exceeded 5 μg/L was associated with a −1.83 g (95% CI: −3.30, −0.38) lower term birth weight after adjusting for covariates. Similarly, a 10-percentage point increase in the probability that private well arsenic concentrations exceeded 10 μg/L was associated with a −2.79 g (95% CI: −4.99, −0.58) lower term birth weight. Associations with gestational age were null. Conclusion: In this largest epidemiologic study of arsenic and birth outcomes to date, we did not observe associations of modeled arsenic estimates in private wells with gestational age and found modest inverse associations with term birth weight. Study limitations may have obscured true associations, including measurement error stemming from a lack of individual-level information on primary water sources, water arsenic concentrations, and water consumption patterns. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T06:41:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2ef9bb6b643e4df7b405cf3b17a70489 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0160-4120 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T06:41:50Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Environment International |
spelling | doaj.art-2ef9bb6b643e4df7b405cf3b17a704892022-12-22T02:57:43ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202022-05-01163107176Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United StatesCatherine M. Bulka0Molly Scannell Bryan1Melissa A. Lombard2Scott M. Bartell3Daniel K. Jones4Paul M. Bradley5Veronica M. Vieira6Debra T. Silverman7Michael Focazio8Patricia L. Toccalino9Johnni Daniel10Lorraine C. Backer11Joseph D. Ayotte12Matthew O. Gribble13Maria Argos14Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USAInstitute for Minority Health Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1819 W. Polk Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USAU.S. Geological Survey, New England Water Science Center, 331 Commerce Way, Pembroke, NH 03275, USADepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of California, 653 E. Peltason Drive, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; Department of Statistics, University of California, Bren Hall 2019, Irvine, CA 92697, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Utah Water Science Center, 2329 West Orton Circle, West Valley City, UT 84119, USAU.S. Geological Survey, South Atlantic Water Science Center, 720 Gracern Rd, Columbia, SC 29210, USADepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of California, 653 E. Peltason Drive, Irvine, CA 92697, USAOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USAU.S. Geological Survey, National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr, Reston, VA 20192, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Northwest-Pacific Region, 2130 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR 97201, USANational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USANational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USAU.S. Geological Survey, New England Water Science Center, 331 Commerce Way, Pembroke, NH 03275, USADepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 217G Ryals Public Health Building, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham AL 35294, USADivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Office 878A, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; Corresponding author.Background: Prenatal exposure to drinking water with arsenic concentrations >50 μg/L is associated with adverse birth outcomes, with inconclusive evidence for concentrations ≤50 μg/L. In a collaborative effort by public health experts, hydrologists, and geologists, we used published machine learning model estimates to characterize arsenic concentrations in private wells—federally unregulated for drinking water contaminants—and evaluated associations with birth outcomes throughout the conterminous U.S. Methods: Using several machine learning models, including boosted regression trees (BRT) and random forest classification (RFC), developed from measured groundwater arsenic concentrations of ∼20,000 private wells, we characterized the probability that arsenic concentrations occurred within specific ranges in groundwater. Probabilistic model estimates and private well usage data were linked by county to all live birth certificates from 2016 (n = 3.6 million). We evaluated associations with gestational age and term birth weight using mixed-effects models, adjusted for potential confounders and incorporated random intercepts for spatial clustering. Results: We generally observed inverse associations with term birth weight. For instance, when using BRT estimates, a 10-percentage point increase in the probability that private well arsenic concentrations exceeded 5 μg/L was associated with a −1.83 g (95% CI: −3.30, −0.38) lower term birth weight after adjusting for covariates. Similarly, a 10-percentage point increase in the probability that private well arsenic concentrations exceeded 10 μg/L was associated with a −2.79 g (95% CI: −4.99, −0.58) lower term birth weight. Associations with gestational age were null. Conclusion: In this largest epidemiologic study of arsenic and birth outcomes to date, we did not observe associations of modeled arsenic estimates in private wells with gestational age and found modest inverse associations with term birth weight. Study limitations may have obscured true associations, including measurement error stemming from a lack of individual-level information on primary water sources, water arsenic concentrations, and water consumption patterns.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412022001027ArsenicPrivate wellsWater contaminationBirth outcomesEpidemiology |
spellingShingle | Catherine M. Bulka Molly Scannell Bryan Melissa A. Lombard Scott M. Bartell Daniel K. Jones Paul M. Bradley Veronica M. Vieira Debra T. Silverman Michael Focazio Patricia L. Toccalino Johnni Daniel Lorraine C. Backer Joseph D. Ayotte Matthew O. Gribble Maria Argos Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States Environment International Arsenic Private wells Water contamination Birth outcomes Epidemiology |
title | Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States |
title_full | Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States |
title_fullStr | Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States |
title_short | Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States |
title_sort | arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the united states |
topic | Arsenic Private wells Water contamination Birth outcomes Epidemiology |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412022001027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT catherinembulka arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT mollyscannellbryan arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT melissaalombard arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT scottmbartell arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT danielkjones arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT paulmbradley arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT veronicamvieira arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT debratsilverman arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT michaelfocazio arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT patricialtoccalino arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT johnnidaniel arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT lorrainecbacker arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT josephdayotte arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT matthewogribble arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates AT mariaargos arsenicinprivatewellwaterandbirthoutcomesintheunitedstates |