Fate of clinical research studies after ethical approval--follow-up of study protocols until publication.
<h4>Background</h4>Many clinical studies are ultimately not fully published in peer-reviewed journals. Underreporting of clinical research is wasteful and can result in biased estimates of treatment effect or harm, leading to recommendations that are inappropriate or even dangerous.<h...
Main Authors: | Anette Blümle, Joerg J Meerpohl, Martin Schumacher, Erik von Elm |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24586265/pdf/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
Premature Discontinuation of Prospective Clinical Studies Approved by a Research Ethics Committee - A Comparison of Randomised and Non-Randomised Studies.
by: Anette Blümle, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
A multi-state model analysis of the time from ethical approval to publication of clinical research studies.
by: Anette Blümle, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries.
by: Christine Schmucker, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
by: Christine M Schmucker, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions
by: Wolff Robert F, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01)