Intraoral Scanning as an Alternative to Evaluate the Accuracy of Dental Implant Placements in Partially Edentate Situations: A Prospective Clinical Case Series
(1) Background: For years, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography’s (CBCT) have been the golden standard to evaluate implant placement accuracy. By validating Intraoral Scans (IOS) as an alternative to determine implant placement accuracy, a second CBCT could be avoided. (2) Methods: Using dynamic guided imp...
Main Authors: | Jan van Hooft, Guido Kielenstijn, Jeroen Liebregts, Frank Baan, Gert Meijer, Jan D’haese, Ewald Bronkhorst, Luc Verhamme |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/19/5876 |
Similar Items
-
Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study
by: Francesco Guido Mangano, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review
by: Nizam Abdullah, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
by: Mario Imburgia, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Influence of the Tube Angle on the Measurement Accuracy of Peri-Implant Bone Defects in Rectangular Intraoral X-ray Imaging
by: Petra Rugani, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography, intraoral radiography, and periodontal probing for periodontal bone defects measurement
by: Eskandarlo A, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01)