Camera–Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact Estimations

For the safety of road traffic, it is crucial to accurately estimate the time it will take for a moving object to reach a specific location (time-to-contact estimation, TTC). Observers make more or less accurate TTC estimates of objects of average size that are moving at constant speeds. However, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisabeth Maria Wögerbauer, Heiko Hecht, Marlene Wessels
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Vision
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5150/7/4/65
_version_ 1797379075950510080
author Elisabeth Maria Wögerbauer
Heiko Hecht
Marlene Wessels
author_facet Elisabeth Maria Wögerbauer
Heiko Hecht
Marlene Wessels
author_sort Elisabeth Maria Wögerbauer
collection DOAJ
description For the safety of road traffic, it is crucial to accurately estimate the time it will take for a moving object to reach a specific location (time-to-contact estimation, TTC). Observers make more or less accurate TTC estimates of objects of average size that are moving at constant speeds. However, they make perceptual errors when judging objects which accelerate or which are unusually large or small. In the former case, for instance, when asked to extrapolate the motion of an accelerating object, observers tend to assume that the object continues to move with the speed it had before it went out of sight. In the latter case, the TTC of large objects is underestimated, whereas the TTC of small objects is overestimated, as if physical size is confounded with retinal size (the size–arrival effect). In normal viewing, these perceptual errors cannot be helped, but camera–monitor systems offer the unique opportunity to exploit the size–arrival effect to cancel out errors induced by the failure to respond to acceleration. To explore whether such error cancellation can work in principle, we conducted two experiments using a prediction-motion paradigm in which the size of the approaching vehicle was manipulated. The results demonstrate that altering the vehicle’s size had the expected influence on the TTC estimation. This finding has practical implications for the implementation of camera–monitor systems.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:16:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f0dc8e1e1c44b0bbba98797ffcb7689
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2411-5150
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:16:53Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Vision
spelling doaj.art-2f0dc8e1e1c44b0bbba98797ffcb76892023-12-22T14:49:32ZengMDPI AGVision2411-51502023-10-01746510.3390/vision7040065Camera–Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact EstimationsElisabeth Maria Wögerbauer0Heiko Hecht1Marlene Wessels2Department of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55122 Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55122 Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55122 Mainz, GermanyFor the safety of road traffic, it is crucial to accurately estimate the time it will take for a moving object to reach a specific location (time-to-contact estimation, TTC). Observers make more or less accurate TTC estimates of objects of average size that are moving at constant speeds. However, they make perceptual errors when judging objects which accelerate or which are unusually large or small. In the former case, for instance, when asked to extrapolate the motion of an accelerating object, observers tend to assume that the object continues to move with the speed it had before it went out of sight. In the latter case, the TTC of large objects is underestimated, whereas the TTC of small objects is overestimated, as if physical size is confounded with retinal size (the size–arrival effect). In normal viewing, these perceptual errors cannot be helped, but camera–monitor systems offer the unique opportunity to exploit the size–arrival effect to cancel out errors induced by the failure to respond to acceleration. To explore whether such error cancellation can work in principle, we conducted two experiments using a prediction-motion paradigm in which the size of the approaching vehicle was manipulated. The results demonstrate that altering the vehicle’s size had the expected influence on the TTC estimation. This finding has practical implications for the implementation of camera–monitor systems.https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5150/7/4/65time-to-collision estimationaccelerationcamera–monitor systems
spellingShingle Elisabeth Maria Wögerbauer
Heiko Hecht
Marlene Wessels
Camera–Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact Estimations
Vision
time-to-collision estimation
acceleration
camera–monitor systems
title Camera–Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact Estimations
title_full Camera–Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact Estimations
title_fullStr Camera–Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact Estimations
title_full_unstemmed Camera–Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact Estimations
title_short Camera–Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact Estimations
title_sort camera monitor systems as an opportunity to compensate for perceptual errors in time to contact estimations
topic time-to-collision estimation
acceleration
camera–monitor systems
url https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5150/7/4/65
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethmariawogerbauer cameramonitorsystemsasanopportunitytocompensateforperceptualerrorsintimetocontactestimations
AT heikohecht cameramonitorsystemsasanopportunitytocompensateforperceptualerrorsintimetocontactestimations
AT marlenewessels cameramonitorsystemsasanopportunitytocompensateforperceptualerrorsintimetocontactestimations