Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum

In 2006, the world’s population passed the threshold of being equally split between rural and urban areas. Since this point, urbanisation has continued, and the majority of the global population are now urban inhabitants. With this ongoing change, it is likely that the way people receive benefits fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Indunee Welivita, Simon Willcock, Amy Lewis, Dilshaad Bundhoo, Tim Brewer, Sarah Cooper, Kenneth Lynch, Sneha Mekala, Prajna Paramita Mishra, Kongala Venkatesh, Dolores Rey Vicario, Paul Hutchings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/430
_version_ 1797537306044792832
author Indunee Welivita
Simon Willcock
Amy Lewis
Dilshaad Bundhoo
Tim Brewer
Sarah Cooper
Kenneth Lynch
Sneha Mekala
Prajna Paramita Mishra
Kongala Venkatesh
Dolores Rey Vicario
Paul Hutchings
author_facet Indunee Welivita
Simon Willcock
Amy Lewis
Dilshaad Bundhoo
Tim Brewer
Sarah Cooper
Kenneth Lynch
Sneha Mekala
Prajna Paramita Mishra
Kongala Venkatesh
Dolores Rey Vicario
Paul Hutchings
author_sort Indunee Welivita
collection DOAJ
description In 2006, the world’s population passed the threshold of being equally split between rural and urban areas. Since this point, urbanisation has continued, and the majority of the global population are now urban inhabitants. With this ongoing change, it is likely that the way people receive benefits from nature (ecosystem services; ES) has also evolved. Environmental theory suggests that rural residents depend directly on their local environment (conceptualised as green-loop systems), whereas urban residents have relatively indirect relationships with distant ecosystems (conceptualised as red-loop systems). Here, we evaluate this theory using survey data from >3000 households in and around Hyderabad, India. Controlling for other confounding socioeconomic variables, we investigate how flows of 10 ES vary across rural, peri-urban and urban areas. For most of the ES we investigated, we found no statistical differences in the levels of direct or indirect use of an ecosystem, the distance to the ecosystem, nor the quantities of ES used between rural and urban residents (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, our results do show that urban people themselves often travel shorter distances than rural people to access most ES, likely because improved infrastructure in urban areas allows for the transport of ES from wider ecosystems to the locality of the beneficiaries’ place of residence. Thus, while we find some evidence to support red-loop–green-loop theory, we conclude that ES flows across the rural-urban spectrum may show more similarities than might be expected. As such, the impact of future urbanisation on ES flows may be limited, because many flows in both rural and urban areas have already undergone globalisation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:14:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f2a4a303d3a48b6b8c3b22402369f5e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:14:13Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-2f2a4a303d3a48b6b8c3b22402369f5e2023-11-21T15:58:39ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-04-0110443010.3390/land10040430Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban SpectrumIndunee Welivita0Simon Willcock1Amy Lewis2Dilshaad Bundhoo3Tim Brewer4Sarah Cooper5Kenneth Lynch6Sneha Mekala7Prajna Paramita Mishra8Kongala Venkatesh9Dolores Rey Vicario10Paul Hutchings11School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UKSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UKSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UKCountryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UKCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UKCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UKCountryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UKIndependent Researcher, Hyderabad 500046, IndiaSchool of Economics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500046, IndiaSchool of Economics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500046, IndiaCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UKCranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UKIn 2006, the world’s population passed the threshold of being equally split between rural and urban areas. Since this point, urbanisation has continued, and the majority of the global population are now urban inhabitants. With this ongoing change, it is likely that the way people receive benefits from nature (ecosystem services; ES) has also evolved. Environmental theory suggests that rural residents depend directly on their local environment (conceptualised as green-loop systems), whereas urban residents have relatively indirect relationships with distant ecosystems (conceptualised as red-loop systems). Here, we evaluate this theory using survey data from >3000 households in and around Hyderabad, India. Controlling for other confounding socioeconomic variables, we investigate how flows of 10 ES vary across rural, peri-urban and urban areas. For most of the ES we investigated, we found no statistical differences in the levels of direct or indirect use of an ecosystem, the distance to the ecosystem, nor the quantities of ES used between rural and urban residents (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, our results do show that urban people themselves often travel shorter distances than rural people to access most ES, likely because improved infrastructure in urban areas allows for the transport of ES from wider ecosystems to the locality of the beneficiaries’ place of residence. Thus, while we find some evidence to support red-loop–green-loop theory, we conclude that ES flows across the rural-urban spectrum may show more similarities than might be expected. As such, the impact of future urbanisation on ES flows may be limited, because many flows in both rural and urban areas have already undergone globalisation.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/430culturalprovisioningregulatinggreen-loopred-loopperi-urban
spellingShingle Indunee Welivita
Simon Willcock
Amy Lewis
Dilshaad Bundhoo
Tim Brewer
Sarah Cooper
Kenneth Lynch
Sneha Mekala
Prajna Paramita Mishra
Kongala Venkatesh
Dolores Rey Vicario
Paul Hutchings
Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum
Land
cultural
provisioning
regulating
green-loop
red-loop
peri-urban
title Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum
title_full Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum
title_fullStr Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum
title_short Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum
title_sort evidence of similarities in ecosystem service flow across the rural urban spectrum
topic cultural
provisioning
regulating
green-loop
red-loop
peri-urban
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/430
work_keys_str_mv AT induneewelivita evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT simonwillcock evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT amylewis evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT dilshaadbundhoo evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT timbrewer evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT sarahcooper evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT kennethlynch evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT snehamekala evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT prajnaparamitamishra evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT kongalavenkatesh evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT doloresreyvicario evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum
AT paulhutchings evidenceofsimilaritiesinecosystemserviceflowacrosstheruralurbanspectrum