Peter Anstey on Locke's Natural Philosophy

Peter Anstey’s book John Locke on Natural Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) (henceforth JLNP), presented an interpretation of Locke’s work on science and medicine, and how this shaped his philosophical views. It was wide-ranging in scope and often impressively detailed. It ra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonathan Craig Walmsley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Libraries, The University of Western Ontario 2016-12-01
Series:Locke Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/locke/article/view/657
_version_ 1797978953191784448
author Jonathan Craig Walmsley
author_facet Jonathan Craig Walmsley
author_sort Jonathan Craig Walmsley
collection DOAJ
description Peter Anstey’s book John Locke on Natural Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) (henceforth JLNP), presented an interpretation of Locke’s work on science and medicine, and how this shaped his philosophical views. It was wide-ranging in scope and often impressively detailed. It raised a number of questions about Locke’s relationship to the work of J. B. van Helmont, his collaboration with Thomas Sydenham, and the overall chronology and trajectory of his natural philosophical interests. It also occasioned a number of questions about methodology in the history of philosophy and how we should construct an interpretation of a thinker like Locke from the published, manuscript and historical records available. Some of these questions were posed explicitly in a ‘Review Article’ in these pages.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:31:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f330b5b6ebe465e821ab2afd2f4f7b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-925X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:31:13Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Western Libraries, The University of Western Ontario
record_format Article
series Locke Studies
spelling doaj.art-2f330b5b6ebe465e821ab2afd2f4f7b62022-12-22T17:00:40ZengWestern Libraries, The University of Western OntarioLocke Studies2561-925X2016-12-011610.5206/ls.2016.657Peter Anstey on Locke's Natural PhilosophyJonathan Craig Walmsley Peter Anstey’s book John Locke on Natural Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) (henceforth JLNP), presented an interpretation of Locke’s work on science and medicine, and how this shaped his philosophical views. It was wide-ranging in scope and often impressively detailed. It raised a number of questions about Locke’s relationship to the work of J. B. van Helmont, his collaboration with Thomas Sydenham, and the overall chronology and trajectory of his natural philosophical interests. It also occasioned a number of questions about methodology in the history of philosophy and how we should construct an interpretation of a thinker like Locke from the published, manuscript and historical records available. Some of these questions were posed explicitly in a ‘Review Article’ in these pages. https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/locke/article/view/657John Locke
spellingShingle Jonathan Craig Walmsley
Peter Anstey on Locke's Natural Philosophy
Locke Studies
John Locke
title Peter Anstey on Locke's Natural Philosophy
title_full Peter Anstey on Locke's Natural Philosophy
title_fullStr Peter Anstey on Locke's Natural Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Peter Anstey on Locke's Natural Philosophy
title_short Peter Anstey on Locke's Natural Philosophy
title_sort peter anstey on locke s natural philosophy
topic John Locke
url https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/locke/article/view/657
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathancraigwalmsley peteransteyonlockesnaturalphilosophy