A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionality

No generic function for the minicolumn—i.e., one that would apply equally well to all cortical areas and species—has yet been proposed. I propose that the minicolumn does have a generic functionality, which only becomes clear when seen in the context of the function of the highe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gerard J Rinkus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2010-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnana.2010.00017/full
_version_ 1818419239646658560
author Gerard J Rinkus
author_facet Gerard J Rinkus
author_sort Gerard J Rinkus
collection DOAJ
description No generic function for the minicolumn—i.e., one that would apply equally well to all cortical areas and species—has yet been proposed. I propose that the minicolumn does have a generic functionality, which only becomes clear when seen in the context of the function of the higher-level, subsuming unit, the macrocolumn. I propose that: a) a macrocolumn’s function is to store sparse distributed representations of its inputs and to be a recognizer of those inputs; and b) the generic function of the minicolumn is to enforce macrocolumnar code sparseness. The minicolumn, defined here as a physically localized pool of ~20 L2/3 pyramidals, does this by acting as a winner-take-all (WTA) competitive module, implying that macrocolumnar codes consist of ~70 active L2/3 cells, assuming ~70 minicolumns per macrocolumn. I describe an algorithm for activating these codes during both learning and retrievals, which causes more similar inputs to map to more highly intersecting codes, a property which yields ultra-fast (immediate, first-shot) storage and retrieval. The algorithm achieves this by adding an amount of randomness (noise) into the code selection process, which is inversely proportional to an input’s familiarity. I propose a possible mapping of the algorithm onto cortical circuitry, and adduce evidence for a neuromodulatory implementation of this familiarity-contingent noise mechanism. The model is distinguished from other recent columnar cortical circuit models in proposing a generic minicolumnar function in which a group of cells within the minicolumn, the L2/3 pyramidals, compete (WTA) to be part of the macrocolumnar code.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T12:35:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f424bd2609449e88c59a002acf51093
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5129
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T12:35:25Z
publishDate 2010-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
spelling doaj.art-2f424bd2609449e88c59a002acf510932022-12-21T23:01:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroanatomy1662-51292010-06-01410.3389/fnana.2010.000171235A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionalityGerard J Rinkus0Brandeis UniversityNo generic function for the minicolumn—i.e., one that would apply equally well to all cortical areas and species—has yet been proposed. I propose that the minicolumn does have a generic functionality, which only becomes clear when seen in the context of the function of the higher-level, subsuming unit, the macrocolumn. I propose that: a) a macrocolumn’s function is to store sparse distributed representations of its inputs and to be a recognizer of those inputs; and b) the generic function of the minicolumn is to enforce macrocolumnar code sparseness. The minicolumn, defined here as a physically localized pool of ~20 L2/3 pyramidals, does this by acting as a winner-take-all (WTA) competitive module, implying that macrocolumnar codes consist of ~70 active L2/3 cells, assuming ~70 minicolumns per macrocolumn. I describe an algorithm for activating these codes during both learning and retrievals, which causes more similar inputs to map to more highly intersecting codes, a property which yields ultra-fast (immediate, first-shot) storage and retrieval. The algorithm achieves this by adding an amount of randomness (noise) into the code selection process, which is inversely proportional to an input’s familiarity. I propose a possible mapping of the algorithm onto cortical circuitry, and adduce evidence for a neuromodulatory implementation of this familiarity-contingent noise mechanism. The model is distinguished from other recent columnar cortical circuit models in proposing a generic minicolumnar function in which a group of cells within the minicolumn, the L2/3 pyramidals, compete (WTA) to be part of the macrocolumnar code.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnana.2010.00017/fullLearningMemorynovelty detectionNeuromodulatorpopulation codingmacrocolumn
spellingShingle Gerard J Rinkus
A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionality
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Learning
Memory
novelty detection
Neuromodulator
population coding
macrocolumn
title A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionality
title_full A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionality
title_fullStr A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionality
title_full_unstemmed A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionality
title_short A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionality
title_sort cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini and macrocolumn scale functionality
topic Learning
Memory
novelty detection
Neuromodulator
population coding
macrocolumn
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnana.2010.00017/full
work_keys_str_mv AT gerardjrinkus acorticalsparsedistributedcodingmodellinkingminiandmacrocolumnscalefunctionality
AT gerardjrinkus corticalsparsedistributedcodingmodellinkingminiandmacrocolumnscalefunctionality