Model Resolusi Konflik Pemekaran Nagari

DPMN is the third party that helps to resolve the conflict between KAN Nagari Limo Koto and the so call Nagari preparatory government of Padang Laweh Selatan. In resolving the conflict, as a third party DPMN is able to resolve the conflict between the two parties. The objectives of this research ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fadil Haikal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Laboratory sociology , Departement of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Andalas 2019-10-01
Series:Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jsa.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/jsa/article/view/20
_version_ 1811303922442174464
author Fadil Haikal
author_facet Fadil Haikal
author_sort Fadil Haikal
collection DOAJ
description DPMN is the third party that helps to resolve the conflict between KAN Nagari Limo Koto and the so call Nagari preparatory government of Padang Laweh Selatan. In resolving the conflict, as a third party DPMN is able to resolve the conflict between the two parties. The objectives of this research are to describe the resolution of the conflict by both parties and by local governments and to describe the factors that enable DPMN to successfully resolve the conflicts. To achieve the research objectives, this study uses the Structuration Theory proposed by Anthony Giddens and qualitative research method. It was found that the conflict started in 2014 when Nagari Preparation Padang Laweh Selatan was in the process of expansion. At first the conflict was resolved by both parties by way of deliberations twice at the Koto VII sub-district office, but this was unsucessful. Then, after KAN Nagari Limo Koto sent a letter rejecting the expansion of the Nagari Preparation Padang Laweh Selatan to the Regent of Sijunjung, DPMN became the third party in resolving the conflict through conciliation. The conciliation process is carried out by: 1) forming a division team to resolve the conflict; 2) bringing together the two parties to the conflict; 3) collect data related to disputed ulayat lands; 4) trace the history of ulayat lands; 5) make the elite from KAN Nagari Limo Koto as partners in resolving conflicts; 6) make an agreement between the two parties through the Regional Regulation Ranperda; 7) disseminate the draft regional regulation to both parties. The factors that made it easier for DPMN to resolve the Conflict, namely: 1) making the regulations used in the process of dividing the preparatory village of South Padang Laweh as a reference; 2) actors DPMN and Elit Nagari Limo Koto understand that expansion aims to improve community welfare; 3) the conflict is not complicated.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:57:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f4b977c726e4854b8bdf12317f3d82d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2088-1134
2443-3810
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:57:55Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Laboratory sociology , Departement of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Andalas
record_format Article
series Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas
spelling doaj.art-2f4b977c726e4854b8bdf12317f3d82d2022-12-22T02:55:22ZengLaboratory sociology , Departement of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas AndalasJurnal Sosiologi Andalas2088-11342443-38102019-10-015210.25077/jsa.5.2.98-114.2019Model Resolusi Konflik Pemekaran NagariFadil Haikal DPMN is the third party that helps to resolve the conflict between KAN Nagari Limo Koto and the so call Nagari preparatory government of Padang Laweh Selatan. In resolving the conflict, as a third party DPMN is able to resolve the conflict between the two parties. The objectives of this research are to describe the resolution of the conflict by both parties and by local governments and to describe the factors that enable DPMN to successfully resolve the conflicts. To achieve the research objectives, this study uses the Structuration Theory proposed by Anthony Giddens and qualitative research method. It was found that the conflict started in 2014 when Nagari Preparation Padang Laweh Selatan was in the process of expansion. At first the conflict was resolved by both parties by way of deliberations twice at the Koto VII sub-district office, but this was unsucessful. Then, after KAN Nagari Limo Koto sent a letter rejecting the expansion of the Nagari Preparation Padang Laweh Selatan to the Regent of Sijunjung, DPMN became the third party in resolving the conflict through conciliation. The conciliation process is carried out by: 1) forming a division team to resolve the conflict; 2) bringing together the two parties to the conflict; 3) collect data related to disputed ulayat lands; 4) trace the history of ulayat lands; 5) make the elite from KAN Nagari Limo Koto as partners in resolving conflicts; 6) make an agreement between the two parties through the Regional Regulation Ranperda; 7) disseminate the draft regional regulation to both parties. The factors that made it easier for DPMN to resolve the Conflict, namely: 1) making the regulations used in the process of dividing the preparatory village of South Padang Laweh as a reference; 2) actors DPMN and Elit Nagari Limo Koto understand that expansion aims to improve community welfare; 3) the conflict is not complicated. http://jsa.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/jsa/article/view/20Village border conflictconflict resolutionthird party interventionreconciliation
spellingShingle Fadil Haikal
Model Resolusi Konflik Pemekaran Nagari
Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas
Village border conflict
conflict resolution
third party intervention
reconciliation
title Model Resolusi Konflik Pemekaran Nagari
title_full Model Resolusi Konflik Pemekaran Nagari
title_fullStr Model Resolusi Konflik Pemekaran Nagari
title_full_unstemmed Model Resolusi Konflik Pemekaran Nagari
title_short Model Resolusi Konflik Pemekaran Nagari
title_sort model resolusi konflik pemekaran nagari
topic Village border conflict
conflict resolution
third party intervention
reconciliation
url http://jsa.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/jsa/article/view/20
work_keys_str_mv AT fadilhaikal modelresolusikonflikpemekarannagari