How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review.
<h4>Background</h4>Virtual multidisciplinary team meetings (VMDTM) provide a standard of care that is not limited by physical distance or social restrictions. And so, when the COVID-19 pandemic imposed irrefutable social restrictions and made in-person meetings impossible, many hospitals...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294635&type=printable |
| _version_ | 1827587648096567296 |
|---|---|
| author | Muhammad Abdul Rehman Unaiza Naeem Anooja Rani Umm E Salma Shabbar Banatwala Afia Salman Muhammad Abdullah Khalid Areeba Ikram Erfa Tahir |
| author_facet | Muhammad Abdul Rehman Unaiza Naeem Anooja Rani Umm E Salma Shabbar Banatwala Afia Salman Muhammad Abdullah Khalid Areeba Ikram Erfa Tahir |
| author_sort | Muhammad Abdul Rehman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Virtual multidisciplinary team meetings (VMDTM) provide a standard of care that is not limited by physical distance or social restrictions. And so, when the COVID-19 pandemic imposed irrefutable social restrictions and made in-person meetings impossible, many hospitals switched to the VMDTMs. Although the pandemic might have highlighted the ease of VMDTMs, these virtual meetings have existed over the past decade, albeit less in importance. Despite their recent importance, no review has previously assessed the feasibility of VMDTMs through the eyes of the participants, the barriers participants face, nor their comparison with the in-person format. We undertook this scoping review to map existing literature and assess the perspectives of VMDTM participants.<h4>Material and methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from inception till July 1st, 2023 to select studies that evaluated the perspectives of participants of VMDTMs regarding the core components that make up a VMDMT. Four authors, independently, extracted data from all included studies. Two authors separated data into major themes and sub-themes.<h4>Results</h4>We identified six core, intrinsic aspects of a VMDTM that are essential to its structure: (1) organization, (2) case discussion and decision-making, (3) teamwork and communication, (4) training and education, (5) technology, and (6) patient-related aspect. VMDTMs have a high overall satisfaction rating amongst participants. The preference, however, is for a hybrid model of multidisciplinary teams. VMDTMs offer support to isolated physicians, help address complex cases, and offer information that may not be available elsewhere. The periodical nature of VMDTMs is appropriate for their consideration as CMEs. Adequate technology is paramount to the sustenance of the format.<h4>Conclusion</h4>VMDTMs are efficient and offer a multidisciplinary consensus without geographical limitations. Despite certain technical and social limitations, VMDTM participants are highly satisfied with the format, although the preference lies with a hybrid model. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T00:22:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2f4f8b3124f749009f083f2e917f8813 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T00:22:06Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-2f4f8b3124f749009f083f2e917f88132023-12-12T05:33:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-011811e029463510.1371/journal.pone.0294635How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review.Muhammad Abdul RehmanUnaiza NaeemAnooja RaniUmm E Salma Shabbar BanatwalaAfia SalmanMuhammad Abdullah KhalidAreeba IkramErfa Tahir<h4>Background</h4>Virtual multidisciplinary team meetings (VMDTM) provide a standard of care that is not limited by physical distance or social restrictions. And so, when the COVID-19 pandemic imposed irrefutable social restrictions and made in-person meetings impossible, many hospitals switched to the VMDTMs. Although the pandemic might have highlighted the ease of VMDTMs, these virtual meetings have existed over the past decade, albeit less in importance. Despite their recent importance, no review has previously assessed the feasibility of VMDTMs through the eyes of the participants, the barriers participants face, nor their comparison with the in-person format. We undertook this scoping review to map existing literature and assess the perspectives of VMDTM participants.<h4>Material and methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from inception till July 1st, 2023 to select studies that evaluated the perspectives of participants of VMDTMs regarding the core components that make up a VMDMT. Four authors, independently, extracted data from all included studies. Two authors separated data into major themes and sub-themes.<h4>Results</h4>We identified six core, intrinsic aspects of a VMDTM that are essential to its structure: (1) organization, (2) case discussion and decision-making, (3) teamwork and communication, (4) training and education, (5) technology, and (6) patient-related aspect. VMDTMs have a high overall satisfaction rating amongst participants. The preference, however, is for a hybrid model of multidisciplinary teams. VMDTMs offer support to isolated physicians, help address complex cases, and offer information that may not be available elsewhere. The periodical nature of VMDTMs is appropriate for their consideration as CMEs. Adequate technology is paramount to the sustenance of the format.<h4>Conclusion</h4>VMDTMs are efficient and offer a multidisciplinary consensus without geographical limitations. Despite certain technical and social limitations, VMDTM participants are highly satisfied with the format, although the preference lies with a hybrid model.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294635&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Muhammad Abdul Rehman Unaiza Naeem Anooja Rani Umm E Salma Shabbar Banatwala Afia Salman Muhammad Abdullah Khalid Areeba Ikram Erfa Tahir How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review. PLoS ONE |
| title | How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review. |
| title_full | How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review. |
| title_fullStr | How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review. |
| title_full_unstemmed | How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review. |
| title_short | How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review. |
| title_sort | how well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work an assessment of participants perspectives and limitations a scoping review |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294635&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT muhammadabdulrehman howwelldoesthevirtualformatofoncologymultidisciplinaryteammeetingsworkanassessmentofparticipantsperspectivesandlimitationsascopingreview AT unaizanaeem howwelldoesthevirtualformatofoncologymultidisciplinaryteammeetingsworkanassessmentofparticipantsperspectivesandlimitationsascopingreview AT anoojarani howwelldoesthevirtualformatofoncologymultidisciplinaryteammeetingsworkanassessmentofparticipantsperspectivesandlimitationsascopingreview AT ummesalmashabbarbanatwala howwelldoesthevirtualformatofoncologymultidisciplinaryteammeetingsworkanassessmentofparticipantsperspectivesandlimitationsascopingreview AT afiasalman howwelldoesthevirtualformatofoncologymultidisciplinaryteammeetingsworkanassessmentofparticipantsperspectivesandlimitationsascopingreview AT muhammadabdullahkhalid howwelldoesthevirtualformatofoncologymultidisciplinaryteammeetingsworkanassessmentofparticipantsperspectivesandlimitationsascopingreview AT areebaikram howwelldoesthevirtualformatofoncologymultidisciplinaryteammeetingsworkanassessmentofparticipantsperspectivesandlimitationsascopingreview AT erfatahir howwelldoesthevirtualformatofoncologymultidisciplinaryteammeetingsworkanassessmentofparticipantsperspectivesandlimitationsascopingreview |