Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis

Objectives To prospectively compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) and ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (USgRFA) for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis. Methods One hundred and thirty-three women with symptomatic uterine adenomyosis who met the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao Liang Lin, Ning Hai, Jing Zhang, Zhi Yu Han, Jie Yu, Fang Yi Liu, Xue Juan Dong, Ping Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:International Journal of Hyperthermia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2019.1708481
_version_ 1818607792364191744
author Xiao Liang Lin
Ning Hai
Jing Zhang
Zhi Yu Han
Jie Yu
Fang Yi Liu
Xue Juan Dong
Ping Liang
author_facet Xiao Liang Lin
Ning Hai
Jing Zhang
Zhi Yu Han
Jie Yu
Fang Yi Liu
Xue Juan Dong
Ping Liang
author_sort Xiao Liang Lin
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To prospectively compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) and ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (USgRFA) for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis. Methods One hundred and thirty-three women with symptomatic uterine adenomyosis who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study from October 2015 to October 2017. Sixty-eight patients underwent PMWA, and sixty-five patients underwent USgRFA. All patients were followed up for 12 months. Assessment endpoints included treatment time, percentage ablation, percentage uterine regression, symptom severity scores (SSSs), dysmenorrhea scores and adverse events. Results The mean age of the patients in our study was 39.4 ± 4.2 years (range, 35–50 years), and the median volume of uterine adenomyosis was 124.3 cm3 (range, 28.7–374.5 cm3). The mean ablation time was 16.3 ± 4.9 min (range, 5–23 min) in the MWA group, which was demonstrably superior to that of the RFA group, which was 37.5 ± 6.2 min (range, 5–39 min). The mean percentages of ablation of uterine adenomyosis were 79.7 ± 15.1% and 79.2 ± 14.2% in the MWA group and the RFA group, respectively, and showed no significant difference between the groups. The percentages of regression of uterine volume also showed no marked difference between the two groups. Changes in the dysmenorrhea scores and the SSSs after ablation were similar in the MWA group and in the RFA group, and no significant difference was found between the groups. Finally, the percentage occurrence of adverse events was the same in the two groups. Conclusions The safety and effectiveness of PMWA and USgRFA in the treatment of uterine adenomyosis were similar; however, the mean ablation time of PMWA was shorter than that of USgRFA.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:32:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f50e05fb1cc4289a4380f4e6283d66d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:32:23Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Hyperthermia
spelling doaj.art-2f50e05fb1cc4289a4380f4e6283d66d2022-12-21T22:28:12ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572020-01-0137115115610.1080/02656736.2019.17084811708481Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosisXiao Liang Lin0Ning Hai1Jing Zhang2Zhi Yu Han3Jie Yu4Fang Yi Liu5Xue Juan Dong6Ping Liang7Department of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General HospitalDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General HospitalDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General HospitalDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General HospitalDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General HospitalDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General HospitalDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General HospitalObjectives To prospectively compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) and ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (USgRFA) for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis. Methods One hundred and thirty-three women with symptomatic uterine adenomyosis who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study from October 2015 to October 2017. Sixty-eight patients underwent PMWA, and sixty-five patients underwent USgRFA. All patients were followed up for 12 months. Assessment endpoints included treatment time, percentage ablation, percentage uterine regression, symptom severity scores (SSSs), dysmenorrhea scores and adverse events. Results The mean age of the patients in our study was 39.4 ± 4.2 years (range, 35–50 years), and the median volume of uterine adenomyosis was 124.3 cm3 (range, 28.7–374.5 cm3). The mean ablation time was 16.3 ± 4.9 min (range, 5–23 min) in the MWA group, which was demonstrably superior to that of the RFA group, which was 37.5 ± 6.2 min (range, 5–39 min). The mean percentages of ablation of uterine adenomyosis were 79.7 ± 15.1% and 79.2 ± 14.2% in the MWA group and the RFA group, respectively, and showed no significant difference between the groups. The percentages of regression of uterine volume also showed no marked difference between the two groups. Changes in the dysmenorrhea scores and the SSSs after ablation were similar in the MWA group and in the RFA group, and no significant difference was found between the groups. Finally, the percentage occurrence of adverse events was the same in the two groups. Conclusions The safety and effectiveness of PMWA and USgRFA in the treatment of uterine adenomyosis were similar; however, the mean ablation time of PMWA was shorter than that of USgRFA.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2019.1708481adenomyosisablationtreatmentdysmenorrheamicrowavecomparison
spellingShingle Xiao Liang Lin
Ning Hai
Jing Zhang
Zhi Yu Han
Jie Yu
Fang Yi Liu
Xue Juan Dong
Ping Liang
Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis
International Journal of Hyperthermia
adenomyosis
ablation
treatment
dysmenorrhea
microwave
comparison
title Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis
title_full Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis
title_fullStr Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis
title_short Comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis
title_sort comparison between microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating symptomatic uterine adenomyosis
topic adenomyosis
ablation
treatment
dysmenorrhea
microwave
comparison
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2019.1708481
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaolianglin comparisonbetweenmicrowaveablationandradiofrequencyablationfortreatingsymptomaticuterineadenomyosis
AT ninghai comparisonbetweenmicrowaveablationandradiofrequencyablationfortreatingsymptomaticuterineadenomyosis
AT jingzhang comparisonbetweenmicrowaveablationandradiofrequencyablationfortreatingsymptomaticuterineadenomyosis
AT zhiyuhan comparisonbetweenmicrowaveablationandradiofrequencyablationfortreatingsymptomaticuterineadenomyosis
AT jieyu comparisonbetweenmicrowaveablationandradiofrequencyablationfortreatingsymptomaticuterineadenomyosis
AT fangyiliu comparisonbetweenmicrowaveablationandradiofrequencyablationfortreatingsymptomaticuterineadenomyosis
AT xuejuandong comparisonbetweenmicrowaveablationandradiofrequencyablationfortreatingsymptomaticuterineadenomyosis
AT pingliang comparisonbetweenmicrowaveablationandradiofrequencyablationfortreatingsymptomaticuterineadenomyosis