Relative Change of Protidemia Level Predicts Intradialytic Hypotension

Background Hemodialysis patients are at risk of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), which is associated with mortality and cardiovascular and neurological events. The use of biomarkers of volemia such as relative change in protidemia and BNP (B‐natriuretic peptide) levels to predict IDH remains unknown...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maureen Assayag, David Levy, Pascal Seris, Catherine Maheas, Anne‐Lyse Langlois, Kamal Moubakir, Sophie Laplanche, Christophe Ridel, Maxime Touzot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014264
_version_ 1811334119255179264
author Maureen Assayag
David Levy
Pascal Seris
Catherine Maheas
Anne‐Lyse Langlois
Kamal Moubakir
Sophie Laplanche
Christophe Ridel
Maxime Touzot
author_facet Maureen Assayag
David Levy
Pascal Seris
Catherine Maheas
Anne‐Lyse Langlois
Kamal Moubakir
Sophie Laplanche
Christophe Ridel
Maxime Touzot
author_sort Maureen Assayag
collection DOAJ
description Background Hemodialysis patients are at risk of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), which is associated with mortality and cardiovascular and neurological events. The use of biomarkers of volemia such as relative change in protidemia and BNP (B‐natriuretic peptide) levels to predict IDH remains unknown. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective observational study, which enrolled 170 chronic hemodialysis patients in a single center from September 2015 to March 2016. BNP and the relative change of protidemia level (Δprotidemia=postdialysis protidemia−predialysis protidemia) were measured monthly over 6 months. A logistic mixed regression model was used to define the best biomarkers that predict the 30‐day risk of IDH. Receiver operating characteristic analysis area under the curve was used to define the cutoff values of Δprotidemia that predict IDH A logistic mixed model reveals that Δprotidemia predicts the 30‐day risk of IDH but not BNP or age; odds ratio=1.12, 95% CI 1.08‐1.17), odds ratio=0.81, 95% CI (0.64; 1.07) and odds ratio =0.015 95% CI (0.99; 1.03), respectively. Adding the ultrafiltration rate did not improve the model. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that Δprotidemia of 10 g/L allowed for discrimination of the patients with IDH (area under the curve= 0.67; 95% CI 0.62‐0.72, P<0.05). There was an increase in area under the curve to 0.71 (95% CI 0.63‐0.76) in a subgroup of hemodialysis with BNP <300 ng/L, for a cutoff value of 11 g/L, especially for the nondiabetic patients. Conclusions Relative change in protidemia level (Δprotidemia) outperforms BNP and ultrafiltration rate as a predictor for 30‐day risk of IDH. These results should be confirmed by a prospective study.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:03:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f58e5a9950643f181e503586d1ff39e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:03:06Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-2f58e5a9950643f181e503586d1ff39e2022-12-22T02:38:35ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802020-01-019110.1161/JAHA.119.014264Relative Change of Protidemia Level Predicts Intradialytic HypotensionMaureen Assayag0David Levy1Pascal Seris2Catherine Maheas3Anne‐Lyse Langlois4Kamal Moubakir5Sophie Laplanche6Christophe Ridel7Maxime Touzot8Urgences Néphrologiques et Transplantation Rénale Hôpital Tenon Paris FranceService de Medecine Interne Centre Hospitalier de Soisson Soisson FranceDialyse et Aphérèse Thérapeutique AURA Paris Plaisance Paris FranceDialyse et Aphérèse Thérapeutique AURA Paris Plaisance Paris FranceDialyse et Aphérèse Thérapeutique AURA Paris Plaisance Paris FranceDialyse et Aphérèse Thérapeutique AURA Paris Plaisance Paris FranceLaboratoire de Biologie Médicale Groupe Hospitalier Saint‐Joseph Paris FranceDialyse et Aphérèse Thérapeutique AURA Paris Plaisance Paris FranceDialyse et Aphérèse Thérapeutique AURA Paris Plaisance Paris FranceBackground Hemodialysis patients are at risk of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), which is associated with mortality and cardiovascular and neurological events. The use of biomarkers of volemia such as relative change in protidemia and BNP (B‐natriuretic peptide) levels to predict IDH remains unknown. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective observational study, which enrolled 170 chronic hemodialysis patients in a single center from September 2015 to March 2016. BNP and the relative change of protidemia level (Δprotidemia=postdialysis protidemia−predialysis protidemia) were measured monthly over 6 months. A logistic mixed regression model was used to define the best biomarkers that predict the 30‐day risk of IDH. Receiver operating characteristic analysis area under the curve was used to define the cutoff values of Δprotidemia that predict IDH A logistic mixed model reveals that Δprotidemia predicts the 30‐day risk of IDH but not BNP or age; odds ratio=1.12, 95% CI 1.08‐1.17), odds ratio=0.81, 95% CI (0.64; 1.07) and odds ratio =0.015 95% CI (0.99; 1.03), respectively. Adding the ultrafiltration rate did not improve the model. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that Δprotidemia of 10 g/L allowed for discrimination of the patients with IDH (area under the curve= 0.67; 95% CI 0.62‐0.72, P<0.05). There was an increase in area under the curve to 0.71 (95% CI 0.63‐0.76) in a subgroup of hemodialysis with BNP <300 ng/L, for a cutoff value of 11 g/L, especially for the nondiabetic patients. Conclusions Relative change in protidemia level (Δprotidemia) outperforms BNP and ultrafiltration rate as a predictor for 30‐day risk of IDH. These results should be confirmed by a prospective study.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014264brain natriuretic peptidedialysishemoconcentrationhypotension
spellingShingle Maureen Assayag
David Levy
Pascal Seris
Catherine Maheas
Anne‐Lyse Langlois
Kamal Moubakir
Sophie Laplanche
Christophe Ridel
Maxime Touzot
Relative Change of Protidemia Level Predicts Intradialytic Hypotension
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
brain natriuretic peptide
dialysis
hemoconcentration
hypotension
title Relative Change of Protidemia Level Predicts Intradialytic Hypotension
title_full Relative Change of Protidemia Level Predicts Intradialytic Hypotension
title_fullStr Relative Change of Protidemia Level Predicts Intradialytic Hypotension
title_full_unstemmed Relative Change of Protidemia Level Predicts Intradialytic Hypotension
title_short Relative Change of Protidemia Level Predicts Intradialytic Hypotension
title_sort relative change of protidemia level predicts intradialytic hypotension
topic brain natriuretic peptide
dialysis
hemoconcentration
hypotension
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014264
work_keys_str_mv AT maureenassayag relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension
AT davidlevy relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension
AT pascalseris relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension
AT catherinemaheas relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension
AT annelyselanglois relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension
AT kamalmoubakir relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension
AT sophielaplanche relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension
AT christopheridel relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension
AT maximetouzot relativechangeofprotidemialevelpredictsintradialytichypotension