Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize Monoculture

Sulfur nutrition is a critical part of proper crop growth and development. In our study, biomass yields (BY) and S uptake were investigated on long-term maize monoculture on haplic luvisol soil during the 23 years of this trial, as well as changes in water extractable (S<sub>w</sub>), ad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pavel Suran, Martin Kulhánek, Jiří Balík, Jindřich Černý, Ondřej Sedlář
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/12/2376
_version_ 1797506988240797696
author Pavel Suran
Martin Kulhánek
Jiří Balík
Jindřich Černý
Ondřej Sedlář
author_facet Pavel Suran
Martin Kulhánek
Jiří Balík
Jindřich Černý
Ondřej Sedlář
author_sort Pavel Suran
collection DOAJ
description Sulfur nutrition is a critical part of proper crop growth and development. In our study, biomass yields (BY) and S uptake were investigated on long-term maize monoculture on haplic luvisol soil during the 23 years of this trial, as well as changes in water extractable (S<sub>w</sub>), adsorbed (S<sub>ads</sub>), mineral (S<sub>av</sub>), and pseudo-total S (S<sub>t</sub>) fractions. Treatments used in this study are: (1) Control (Cont); (2) ammonium sulfate (AS); (3) urea and ammonium nitrate (UAN); (4) UAN + phosphorus and potassium (UAN + PK); (5) UAN + phosphorus, magnesium, sulfur (UAN + PMgS); and (6) Fallow. Recently, the Mehlich 3 method started to be used in the Czech Republic to determine content of plant available S. Using this method, it was found that the content of S extracted by Mehlich 3 (S<sub>M3</sub>) closely correlates to S<sub>av</sub> in both topsoil and subsoil (r = 0.958 in 1997 and 0.990 in 2019, both at <i>p</i> < 0.001). We also found that, on average, during the entire experiment, all treatments had increased yields over Cont (135–147%) and increased S uptake (291, 192, 180, and 246% of Cont for AS, UAN, UAN + PK, and UAN + PMgS, respectively). Examining the changes from 1997 to 2019 in topsoil (0–30 cm depth), we discovered a decrease of S content in S<sub>w</sub>, S<sub>ads</sub>, S<sub>av</sub>, and S<sub>t</sub> fractions on all treatments to an average of 34.6%, 65.8%, 42.2%, and 78.6% of their initial values. The exception was AS treatment, which doubled its initial content in mineral fractions and maintained the same levels of S<sub>t</sub>, and which we attribute to the very high dose of S on this treatment (142 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). Using the simple balance method, AS and UAN + PMgS treatments lost 142.2 and 95.3 kg S ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> to other sinks, except plant uptake, from the entire soil profile (0–60 cm) during 23 years of experiment. Other treatments also show significant losses with the exception of Fallow. Given these results, it is clear that content of sulfur in soil is generally decreasing and attention should be paid mainly towards minimizing of its losses.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:41:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f5dc41514c142129f17ade90a1d24f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:41:17Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-2f5dc41514c142129f17ade90a1d24f42023-11-23T03:20:52ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952021-11-011112237610.3390/agronomy11122376Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize MonoculturePavel Suran0Martin Kulhánek1Jiří Balík2Jindřich Černý3Ondřej Sedlář4Department of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, 16500 Prague, Czech RepublicSulfur nutrition is a critical part of proper crop growth and development. In our study, biomass yields (BY) and S uptake were investigated on long-term maize monoculture on haplic luvisol soil during the 23 years of this trial, as well as changes in water extractable (S<sub>w</sub>), adsorbed (S<sub>ads</sub>), mineral (S<sub>av</sub>), and pseudo-total S (S<sub>t</sub>) fractions. Treatments used in this study are: (1) Control (Cont); (2) ammonium sulfate (AS); (3) urea and ammonium nitrate (UAN); (4) UAN + phosphorus and potassium (UAN + PK); (5) UAN + phosphorus, magnesium, sulfur (UAN + PMgS); and (6) Fallow. Recently, the Mehlich 3 method started to be used in the Czech Republic to determine content of plant available S. Using this method, it was found that the content of S extracted by Mehlich 3 (S<sub>M3</sub>) closely correlates to S<sub>av</sub> in both topsoil and subsoil (r = 0.958 in 1997 and 0.990 in 2019, both at <i>p</i> < 0.001). We also found that, on average, during the entire experiment, all treatments had increased yields over Cont (135–147%) and increased S uptake (291, 192, 180, and 246% of Cont for AS, UAN, UAN + PK, and UAN + PMgS, respectively). Examining the changes from 1997 to 2019 in topsoil (0–30 cm depth), we discovered a decrease of S content in S<sub>w</sub>, S<sub>ads</sub>, S<sub>av</sub>, and S<sub>t</sub> fractions on all treatments to an average of 34.6%, 65.8%, 42.2%, and 78.6% of their initial values. The exception was AS treatment, which doubled its initial content in mineral fractions and maintained the same levels of S<sub>t</sub>, and which we attribute to the very high dose of S on this treatment (142 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). Using the simple balance method, AS and UAN + PMgS treatments lost 142.2 and 95.3 kg S ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> to other sinks, except plant uptake, from the entire soil profile (0–60 cm) during 23 years of experiment. Other treatments also show significant losses with the exception of Fallow. Given these results, it is clear that content of sulfur in soil is generally decreasing and attention should be paid mainly towards minimizing of its losses.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/12/2376cornmineral fertilizingsoil sulfur fractionsulfur balanceMehlich 3
spellingShingle Pavel Suran
Martin Kulhánek
Jiří Balík
Jindřich Černý
Ondřej Sedlář
Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize Monoculture
Agronomy
corn
mineral fertilizing
soil sulfur fraction
sulfur balance
Mehlich 3
title Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize Monoculture
title_full Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize Monoculture
title_fullStr Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize Monoculture
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize Monoculture
title_short Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize Monoculture
title_sort evaluation of soil s pools under 23 years of maize monoculture
topic corn
mineral fertilizing
soil sulfur fraction
sulfur balance
Mehlich 3
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/12/2376
work_keys_str_mv AT pavelsuran evaluationofsoilspoolsunder23yearsofmaizemonoculture
AT martinkulhanek evaluationofsoilspoolsunder23yearsofmaizemonoculture
AT jiribalik evaluationofsoilspoolsunder23yearsofmaizemonoculture
AT jindrichcerny evaluationofsoilspoolsunder23yearsofmaizemonoculture
AT ondrejsedlar evaluationofsoilspoolsunder23yearsofmaizemonoculture