Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear Model

Group-level repeated measurements are common in neuroimaging, yet their analysis remains complex. Although a variety of specialized tools now exist, it is surprising that to-date there has been no clear discussion of how repeated-measurements can be analyzed appropriately using the standard general...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martyn McFarquhar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2019.00352/full
_version_ 1828802497401061376
author Martyn McFarquhar
author_facet Martyn McFarquhar
author_sort Martyn McFarquhar
collection DOAJ
description Group-level repeated measurements are common in neuroimaging, yet their analysis remains complex. Although a variety of specialized tools now exist, it is surprising that to-date there has been no clear discussion of how repeated-measurements can be analyzed appropriately using the standard general linear model approach, as implemented in software such as SPM and FSL. This is particularly surprising given that these implementations necessitate the use of multiple models, even for seemingly conventional analyses, and that without care it is very easy to specify contrasts that do not correctly test the effects of interest. Despite this, interest in fitting these types of models using conventional tools has been growing in the neuroimaging community. As such it has become even more important to elucidate the correct means of doing so. To begin, this paper will discuss the key concept of the expected mean squares (EMS) for defining suitable F-ratios for testing hypotheses. Once this is understood, the logic of specifying correct repeated measurements models in the GLM should be clear. The ancillary issue of specifying suitable contrast weights in these designs will also be discussed, providing a complimentary perspective on the EMS. A set of steps will then be given alongside an example of specifying a 3-way repeated-measures ANOVA in SPM. Equivalency of the results compared to other statistical software will be demonstrated. Additional issues, such as the inclusion of continuous covariates and the assumption of sphericity, will also be discussed. The hope is that this paper will provide some clarity on this confusing topic, giving researchers the confidence to correctly specify these forms of models within traditional neuroimaging analysis tools.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T07:05:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f62a14e593d406c860b821d866729de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T07:05:15Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-2f62a14e593d406c860b821d866729de2022-12-22T00:33:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2019-04-011310.3389/fnins.2019.00352414497Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear ModelMartyn McFarquharGroup-level repeated measurements are common in neuroimaging, yet their analysis remains complex. Although a variety of specialized tools now exist, it is surprising that to-date there has been no clear discussion of how repeated-measurements can be analyzed appropriately using the standard general linear model approach, as implemented in software such as SPM and FSL. This is particularly surprising given that these implementations necessitate the use of multiple models, even for seemingly conventional analyses, and that without care it is very easy to specify contrasts that do not correctly test the effects of interest. Despite this, interest in fitting these types of models using conventional tools has been growing in the neuroimaging community. As such it has become even more important to elucidate the correct means of doing so. To begin, this paper will discuss the key concept of the expected mean squares (EMS) for defining suitable F-ratios for testing hypotheses. Once this is understood, the logic of specifying correct repeated measurements models in the GLM should be clear. The ancillary issue of specifying suitable contrast weights in these designs will also be discussed, providing a complimentary perspective on the EMS. A set of steps will then be given alongside an example of specifying a 3-way repeated-measures ANOVA in SPM. Equivalency of the results compared to other statistical software will be demonstrated. Additional issues, such as the inclusion of continuous covariates and the assumption of sphericity, will also be discussed. The hope is that this paper will provide some clarity on this confusing topic, giving researchers the confidence to correctly specify these forms of models within traditional neuroimaging analysis tools.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2019.00352/fullrepeated measurementswithin-subjectflexible factorialSPMFSLGLM
spellingShingle Martyn McFarquhar
Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear Model
Frontiers in Neuroscience
repeated measurements
within-subject
flexible factorial
SPM
FSL
GLM
title Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear Model
title_full Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear Model
title_fullStr Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear Model
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear Model
title_short Modeling Group-Level Repeated Measurements of Neuroimaging Data Using the Univariate General Linear Model
title_sort modeling group level repeated measurements of neuroimaging data using the univariate general linear model
topic repeated measurements
within-subject
flexible factorial
SPM
FSL
GLM
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2019.00352/full
work_keys_str_mv AT martynmcfarquhar modelinggrouplevelrepeatedmeasurementsofneuroimagingdatausingtheunivariategenerallinearmodel