Water Grabbing and the Role of Power: Shifting Water Governance in the Light of Agricultural Foreign Direct Investment

In recent years, the trend for foreign actors to secure land for agricultural production in low-income countries has increased substantially. The concurrent acquisition of water resources changes the institutional arrangement for water management in the investment areas. The consequences of 'la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Bues, Insa Theesfeld
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2012-06-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol5/v5issue2/169-a5-2-5/file
_version_ 1828407786096033792
author Andrea Bues
Insa Theesfeld
author_facet Andrea Bues
Insa Theesfeld
author_sort Andrea Bues
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, the trend for foreign actors to secure land for agricultural production in low-income countries has increased substantially. The concurrent acquisition of water resources changes the institutional arrangement for water management in the investment areas. The consequences of 'land grabbing' on the local water governance systems have not so far been adequately examined. This paper presents an institutional analysis of a small-scale irrigation scheme in Ethiopia, where foreign and national horticultural farms started to use water from an irrigation canal that was formerly managed as a user-group common-pool resource by local smallholders. The study follows a qualitative case-study approach with semi-structured interviews as the main source of data. For the analysis we employed the Common-pool Resource Theory and the Distributional Theory of Institutional Change. We found that the former management regime changed in that most of the farmers’ water rights shifted to the investment farms. We found three key characteristics responsible for the different bargaining power of the two actor groups: dependency on natural resources, education and knowledge, and dependency on government support. We conclude that not only the struggle for land but also the directly linked struggle for water is led by diverging interests, which are determined by diverging power resources.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T11:30:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f633f2d404d4e3a9af46629ed706009
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T11:30:36Z
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher Water Alternatives Association
record_format Article
series Water Alternatives
spelling doaj.art-2f633f2d404d4e3a9af46629ed7060092022-12-22T01:50:36ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752012-06-0152266283Water Grabbing and the Role of Power: Shifting Water Governance in the Light of Agricultural Foreign Direct InvestmentAndrea Bues0Insa Theesfeld1Humboldt Universität Berlin, Berlin, GermanyLeibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO), Halle (Saale), GermanyIn recent years, the trend for foreign actors to secure land for agricultural production in low-income countries has increased substantially. The concurrent acquisition of water resources changes the institutional arrangement for water management in the investment areas. The consequences of 'land grabbing' on the local water governance systems have not so far been adequately examined. This paper presents an institutional analysis of a small-scale irrigation scheme in Ethiopia, where foreign and national horticultural farms started to use water from an irrigation canal that was formerly managed as a user-group common-pool resource by local smallholders. The study follows a qualitative case-study approach with semi-structured interviews as the main source of data. For the analysis we employed the Common-pool Resource Theory and the Distributional Theory of Institutional Change. We found that the former management regime changed in that most of the farmers’ water rights shifted to the investment farms. We found three key characteristics responsible for the different bargaining power of the two actor groups: dependency on natural resources, education and knowledge, and dependency on government support. We conclude that not only the struggle for land but also the directly linked struggle for water is led by diverging interests, which are determined by diverging power resources.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol5/v5issue2/169-a5-2-5/fileWater grabbingpower resourceswater rightsagricultural foreign direct investmentEthiopia
spellingShingle Andrea Bues
Insa Theesfeld
Water Grabbing and the Role of Power: Shifting Water Governance in the Light of Agricultural Foreign Direct Investment
Water Alternatives
Water grabbing
power resources
water rights
agricultural foreign direct investment
Ethiopia
title Water Grabbing and the Role of Power: Shifting Water Governance in the Light of Agricultural Foreign Direct Investment
title_full Water Grabbing and the Role of Power: Shifting Water Governance in the Light of Agricultural Foreign Direct Investment
title_fullStr Water Grabbing and the Role of Power: Shifting Water Governance in the Light of Agricultural Foreign Direct Investment
title_full_unstemmed Water Grabbing and the Role of Power: Shifting Water Governance in the Light of Agricultural Foreign Direct Investment
title_short Water Grabbing and the Role of Power: Shifting Water Governance in the Light of Agricultural Foreign Direct Investment
title_sort water grabbing and the role of power shifting water governance in the light of agricultural foreign direct investment
topic Water grabbing
power resources
water rights
agricultural foreign direct investment
Ethiopia
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol5/v5issue2/169-a5-2-5/file
work_keys_str_mv AT andreabues watergrabbingandtheroleofpowershiftingwatergovernanceinthelightofagriculturalforeigndirectinvestment
AT insatheesfeld watergrabbingandtheroleofpowershiftingwatergovernanceinthelightofagriculturalforeigndirectinvestment