A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes

Background: Diabetes is seen to be associated with increased rate of failure of implants. The implant failure can be categorized as ailing, failing, and failed implants. The review of literature did not form any consensus on the effect of diabetes on the implant success rates. The reason we found wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafat Sultana, Amit Raj, Wagisha Barbi, Shakeb Khan Afridi, Bibhu Prasad Mishra, Rajvir Malik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1410;epage=1413;aulast=Sultana
_version_ 1819001021292085248
author Rafat Sultana
Amit Raj
Wagisha Barbi
Shakeb Khan Afridi
Bibhu Prasad Mishra
Rajvir Malik
author_facet Rafat Sultana
Amit Raj
Wagisha Barbi
Shakeb Khan Afridi
Bibhu Prasad Mishra
Rajvir Malik
author_sort Rafat Sultana
collection DOAJ
description Background: Diabetes is seen to be associated with increased rate of failure of implants. The implant failure can be categorized as ailing, failing, and failed implants. The review of literature did not form any consensus on the effect of diabetes on the implant success rates. The reason we found was many confounding factors and nonconsideration of glycemic status of diabetic patients. Hence, in our study, we eliminated the confounding factors and took glycemic index in consideration. Materials and Methods: Forty-six participants were included in this study, out of which 26 were nondiabetic and 20 diabetic. Diabetics were further divided into two groups based on the HBA1C values, as controlled and uncontrolled diabetics. Results: We found that the uncontrolled diabetics had highest rate of implant failure as compared to other two groups. Furthermore, the controlled diabetics and nondiabetics had similar implant successes and failure rates. Conclusion: This suggests that controlled diabetics are comparable to nondiabetics in terms of implant success rates.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T22:42:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f759a3c70894e22a0572c13e6913463
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0975-7406
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T22:42:35Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-2f759a3c70894e22a0572c13e69134632022-12-21T19:24:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062021-01-011361410141310.4103/jpbs.jpbs_229_21A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetesRafat SultanaAmit RajWagisha BarbiShakeb Khan AfridiBibhu Prasad MishraRajvir MalikBackground: Diabetes is seen to be associated with increased rate of failure of implants. The implant failure can be categorized as ailing, failing, and failed implants. The review of literature did not form any consensus on the effect of diabetes on the implant success rates. The reason we found was many confounding factors and nonconsideration of glycemic status of diabetic patients. Hence, in our study, we eliminated the confounding factors and took glycemic index in consideration. Materials and Methods: Forty-six participants were included in this study, out of which 26 were nondiabetic and 20 diabetic. Diabetics were further divided into two groups based on the HBA1C values, as controlled and uncontrolled diabetics. Results: We found that the uncontrolled diabetics had highest rate of implant failure as compared to other two groups. Furthermore, the controlled diabetics and nondiabetics had similar implant successes and failure rates. Conclusion: This suggests that controlled diabetics are comparable to nondiabetics in terms of implant success rates.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1410;epage=1413;aulast=Sultanaailing implantscontrolled diabetesdental implantsdiabetesfailed implantsfailing implantsimplant failuretype i diabetestype ii diabetesuncontrolled diabetes
spellingShingle Rafat Sultana
Amit Raj
Wagisha Barbi
Shakeb Khan Afridi
Bibhu Prasad Mishra
Rajvir Malik
A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
ailing implants
controlled diabetes
dental implants
diabetes
failed implants
failing implants
implant failure
type i diabetes
type ii diabetes
uncontrolled diabetes
title A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_full A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_fullStr A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_short A comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
title_sort comparative study evaluating implant success and bone loss in diabetes and nondiabetes
topic ailing implants
controlled diabetes
dental implants
diabetes
failed implants
failing implants
implant failure
type i diabetes
type ii diabetes
uncontrolled diabetes
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1410;epage=1413;aulast=Sultana
work_keys_str_mv AT rafatsultana acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT amitraj acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT wagishabarbi acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT shakebkhanafridi acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT bibhuprasadmishra acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT rajvirmalik acomparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT rafatsultana comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT amitraj comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT wagishabarbi comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT shakebkhanafridi comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT bibhuprasadmishra comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes
AT rajvirmalik comparativestudyevaluatingimplantsuccessandbonelossindiabetesandnondiabetes