Is half the world's population really below 'replacement-rate'?

A perennial activity of demographers is to estimate the percentage of the world's population which is above or below the 'replacement rate of fertility' [RRF]. However, most attempts to do so have been based upon, at best, oversimplified, or at worst, simply incorrect assumptions abou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart Gietel-Basten, Sergei Scherbov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224985
_version_ 1819142801192910848
author Stuart Gietel-Basten
Sergei Scherbov
author_facet Stuart Gietel-Basten
Sergei Scherbov
author_sort Stuart Gietel-Basten
collection DOAJ
description A perennial activity of demographers is to estimate the percentage of the world's population which is above or below the 'replacement rate of fertility' [RRF]. However, most attempts to do so have been based upon, at best, oversimplified, or at worst, simply incorrect assumptions about what RRF actually is. The objective of this paper is to calculate the proportion of the world's population living in countries with observed period total fertility rates [TFR] below the respective calculated RRF, rather than the commonly used measure of 2.1. While the differences between comparing TFR to 2.1 or RRF are relatively modest in many periods when considering populations at the national level, a significant difference can be observed in the near future based upon India's fertility and mortality trajectories. Our exercise represents a means of 'correcting the record' using the most up-to-date evidence and using the correct protocol.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T12:16:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f76d15eb05b407390e85de651eedfc3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T12:16:07Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2f76d15eb05b407390e85de651eedfc32022-12-21T18:26:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011412e022498510.1371/journal.pone.0224985Is half the world's population really below 'replacement-rate'?Stuart Gietel-BastenSergei ScherbovA perennial activity of demographers is to estimate the percentage of the world's population which is above or below the 'replacement rate of fertility' [RRF]. However, most attempts to do so have been based upon, at best, oversimplified, or at worst, simply incorrect assumptions about what RRF actually is. The objective of this paper is to calculate the proportion of the world's population living in countries with observed period total fertility rates [TFR] below the respective calculated RRF, rather than the commonly used measure of 2.1. While the differences between comparing TFR to 2.1 or RRF are relatively modest in many periods when considering populations at the national level, a significant difference can be observed in the near future based upon India's fertility and mortality trajectories. Our exercise represents a means of 'correcting the record' using the most up-to-date evidence and using the correct protocol.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224985
spellingShingle Stuart Gietel-Basten
Sergei Scherbov
Is half the world's population really below 'replacement-rate'?
PLoS ONE
title Is half the world's population really below 'replacement-rate'?
title_full Is half the world's population really below 'replacement-rate'?
title_fullStr Is half the world's population really below 'replacement-rate'?
title_full_unstemmed Is half the world's population really below 'replacement-rate'?
title_short Is half the world's population really below 'replacement-rate'?
title_sort is half the world s population really below replacement rate
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224985
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartgietelbasten ishalftheworldspopulationreallybelowreplacementrate
AT sergeischerbov ishalftheworldspopulationreallybelowreplacementrate