Ways of Infinity

The paper discusses analogies between the way in which infinity is understood and dealt with in mathematics and in Jewish tradition. It begins with recalling the classical debate about infinity in the field of the foundations of mathematics. Reading an important paper by A. Robinson, we come to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Salanskis Jean-Michel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-03-01
Series:Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0010
_version_ 1818584356468293632
author Salanskis Jean-Michel
author_facet Salanskis Jean-Michel
author_sort Salanskis Jean-Michel
collection DOAJ
description The paper discusses analogies between the way in which infinity is understood and dealt with in mathematics and in Jewish tradition. It begins with recalling the classical debate about infinity in the field of the foundations of mathematics. Reading an important paper by A. Robinson, we come to the conclusion that mathematicians work “as if” infinite totalities existed. They do so by following the rules of their formalized discourse which, at least if it refers to anything at all, also refers to such totalities. The paper describes how, according to Jewish tradition, infinity is also not theological: instead of thinking that they own some infinite being or relate to it, observant Jews follow Jewish law.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:19:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f77c2c3fa8648528a9d9cd2c1b0a6cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0860-150X
2199-6059
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:19:52Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
spelling doaj.art-2f77c2c3fa8648528a9d9cd2c1b0a6cf2022-12-21T22:38:08ZengSciendoStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric0860-150X2199-60592016-03-0144116918010.1515/slgr-2016-0010slgr-2016-0010Ways of InfinitySalanskis Jean-Michel0Université Paris Ouest, Nanterre La DéfenseThe paper discusses analogies between the way in which infinity is understood and dealt with in mathematics and in Jewish tradition. It begins with recalling the classical debate about infinity in the field of the foundations of mathematics. Reading an important paper by A. Robinson, we come to the conclusion that mathematicians work “as if” infinite totalities existed. They do so by following the rules of their formalized discourse which, at least if it refers to anything at all, also refers to such totalities. The paper describes how, according to Jewish tradition, infinity is also not theological: instead of thinking that they own some infinite being or relate to it, observant Jews follow Jewish law.https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0010
spellingShingle Salanskis Jean-Michel
Ways of Infinity
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
title Ways of Infinity
title_full Ways of Infinity
title_fullStr Ways of Infinity
title_full_unstemmed Ways of Infinity
title_short Ways of Infinity
title_sort ways of infinity
url https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0010
work_keys_str_mv AT salanskisjeanmichel waysofinfinity