| Summary: | Abstract Clinical hyponatremia guidelines, protocols and flowcharts are a convenient means for clinicians to quickly establish an etiological diagnosis for hyponatremia, and facilitate its often complex analysis. Unfortunately, they often erroneously attribute multifactorial hyponatremia to a single cause, which is potentially dangerous. In this manuscript, a novel criterion is proposed to quickly determine the physiological relevance of non‐osmotic arginine vasopressin (AVP) release, and to add nuance to hyponatremia analysis. While analyzing hypotonic hyponatremia, it is imperative to not only verify whether or not a certain degree of inappropriate AVP release is present, but also to ascertain whether it—in itself—could sufficiently explain the observed hyponatremia, as these two are not always synonymous. Using well‐known concepts from renal physiology to combine the electrolyte‐free water balance and solute‐free water balance, a novel physiological criterion is derived mathematically to easily distinguish three common hyponatremia scenarios, and to further elucidate the underlying etiology. The derived criterion can hopefully facilitate the clinician's and physiologist's interpretation of plasma and urine parameters in a patient presenting with hyponatremia, and warn against the important clinical pitfall of attributing hyponatremia too readily to a single cause.
|
|---|