Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments

This article discusses “auditory” arguments: arguments in which non-verbal sounds play a central role. It provides examples and explores the use of sounds in argument and argumentation. It argues that auditory arguments are not reducible to verbal arguments but have a similar structure and can be ev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leo Groarke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2018-09-01
Series:Informal Logic
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4954
_version_ 1818145334067462144
author Leo Groarke
author_facet Leo Groarke
author_sort Leo Groarke
collection DOAJ
description This article discusses “auditory” arguments: arguments in which non-verbal sounds play a central role. It provides examples and explores the use of sounds in argument and argumentation. It argues that auditory arguments are not reducible to verbal arguments but have a similar structure and can be evaluated by extending standard informal logic accounts of good argument. I conclude that an understanding of auditory elements of argument can usefully expand the scope of informal logic and argumentation theory.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T12:01:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2f885b567c024c4ebff00f938fe8923a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T12:01:48Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series Informal Logic
spelling doaj.art-2f885b567c024c4ebff00f938fe8923a2022-12-22T01:08:03ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2018-09-0138310.22329/il.v38i3.4954Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' ArgumentsLeo Groarke0Trent UniversityThis article discusses “auditory” arguments: arguments in which non-verbal sounds play a central role. It provides examples and explores the use of sounds in argument and argumentation. It argues that auditory arguments are not reducible to verbal arguments but have a similar structure and can be evaluated by extending standard informal logic accounts of good argument. I conclude that an understanding of auditory elements of argument can usefully expand the scope of informal logic and argumentation theory.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4954
spellingShingle Leo Groarke
Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments
Informal Logic
title Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments
title_full Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments
title_fullStr Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments
title_full_unstemmed Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments
title_short Auditory Arguments: The Logic of 'Sound' Arguments
title_sort auditory arguments the logic of sound arguments
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4954
work_keys_str_mv AT leogroarke auditoryargumentsthelogicofsoundarguments