Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps

When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabienne Rüber, Gilles Wiederkehr, Carolin Steinack, Sylvia Höller, Peter Karl Bode, Fabian Kölbener, Daniel Peter Franzen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/16/4700
Description
Summary:When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its diagnostic yield (DY) is limited. EBUS transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) used as a complimentary technique to EBUS-TBNA might allow for better histopathological evaluation, thus improving DY. In this retrospective bicentric study, we assessed the DY and safety of an EBUS-guided 1.5 mm mini-forceps biopsy combined with EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal/hilar LAD or masses compared to EBUS-TBNA alone. In total, 105 patients were enrolled. The overall DY was 61.9% and 85.7% for TBNA alone and EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBFB, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). While the combined approach was associated with a significantly higher DY for lung cancer diagnosis (97.1% vs. 76.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.016) and sarcoidosis (85.2% vs. 44.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), no significant differences in DY were calculated for subgroups with smaller sample sizes such as lymphoma. No major adverse events were observed. Using a 1.5 mm mini-forceps is a safe and feasible technique for biopsy of mediastinal or hilar LAD or masses with superior overall DY compared to EBUS-TBNA as a standalone technique.
ISSN:2077-0383