Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design

SLE is a complex autoimmune disease with considerable unmet need. Numerous clinical trials designed to investigate novel therapies are actively enrolling patients straining limited resources and creating inefficiencies that increase enrolment challenges. This has motivated investigators developing n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joan T Merrill, Kenneth Kalunian, Sandra Garces, Anca D Askanase, Elaine Karis, May Mo, Cassandra E Milmont
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-01
Series:Lupus Science and Medicine
Online Access:https://lupus.bmj.com/content/10/2/e000890.full
_version_ 1797366335243550720
author Joan T Merrill
Kenneth Kalunian
Sandra Garces
Anca D Askanase
Elaine Karis
May Mo
Cassandra E Milmont
author_facet Joan T Merrill
Kenneth Kalunian
Sandra Garces
Anca D Askanase
Elaine Karis
May Mo
Cassandra E Milmont
author_sort Joan T Merrill
collection DOAJ
description SLE is a complex autoimmune disease with considerable unmet need. Numerous clinical trials designed to investigate novel therapies are actively enrolling patients straining limited resources and creating inefficiencies that increase enrolment challenges. This has motivated investigators developing novel drugs and treatment strategies to consider innovative trial designs that aim to improve the efficiency of generating evidence; these strategies propose conducting fewer trials, involving smaller numbers of patients, while maintaining scientific rigour in safety and efficacy data collection and analysis. In this review we present the design of two innovative phase IIb studies investigating efavaleukin alfa and rozibafusp alfa for the treatment of SLE which use an adaptive study design. This design was selected as a case study, investigating efavaleukin alfa, in the Food and Drug Administration’s Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Program. The adaptive design approach includes prospectively planned modifications at predefined interim timepoints. Interim assessments of futility allow for a trial to end early when the investigational therapy is unlikely to provide meaningful treatment benefits to patients, which can release eligible patients to participate in other—potentially more promising—trials, or seek alternative treatments. Response-adaptive randomisation allows randomisation ratios to change based on accumulating data, in favour of the more efficacious dose arm(s), while the study is ongoing. Throughout the trial the placebo arm allocation ratio is maintained constant. These design elements can improve the statistical power in the estimation of treatment effect and increase the amount of safety and efficacy data collected for the optimal dose(s). Furthermore, these trials can provide the required evidence to potentially serve as one of two confirmatory trials needed for regulatory approval. This can reduce the need for multiple phase III trials, the total patient requirements, person-exposure risk, and ultimately the time and cost of investigational drug development programmes.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:03:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2fa9074c62ef463690b0a0c71f60cdae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2053-8790
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:03:43Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Lupus Science and Medicine
spelling doaj.art-2fa9074c62ef463690b0a0c71f60cdae2024-01-04T06:35:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupLupus Science and Medicine2053-87902023-11-0110210.1136/lupus-2022-000890Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial designJoan T Merrill0Kenneth Kalunian1Sandra Garces2Anca D Askanase3Elaine Karis4May Mo5Cassandra E Milmont65Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, USA4Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of California San Diego, CA, USAAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USAMedicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USAAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USAAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USAAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USASLE is a complex autoimmune disease with considerable unmet need. Numerous clinical trials designed to investigate novel therapies are actively enrolling patients straining limited resources and creating inefficiencies that increase enrolment challenges. This has motivated investigators developing novel drugs and treatment strategies to consider innovative trial designs that aim to improve the efficiency of generating evidence; these strategies propose conducting fewer trials, involving smaller numbers of patients, while maintaining scientific rigour in safety and efficacy data collection and analysis. In this review we present the design of two innovative phase IIb studies investigating efavaleukin alfa and rozibafusp alfa for the treatment of SLE which use an adaptive study design. This design was selected as a case study, investigating efavaleukin alfa, in the Food and Drug Administration’s Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Program. The adaptive design approach includes prospectively planned modifications at predefined interim timepoints. Interim assessments of futility allow for a trial to end early when the investigational therapy is unlikely to provide meaningful treatment benefits to patients, which can release eligible patients to participate in other—potentially more promising—trials, or seek alternative treatments. Response-adaptive randomisation allows randomisation ratios to change based on accumulating data, in favour of the more efficacious dose arm(s), while the study is ongoing. Throughout the trial the placebo arm allocation ratio is maintained constant. These design elements can improve the statistical power in the estimation of treatment effect and increase the amount of safety and efficacy data collected for the optimal dose(s). Furthermore, these trials can provide the required evidence to potentially serve as one of two confirmatory trials needed for regulatory approval. This can reduce the need for multiple phase III trials, the total patient requirements, person-exposure risk, and ultimately the time and cost of investigational drug development programmes.https://lupus.bmj.com/content/10/2/e000890.full
spellingShingle Joan T Merrill
Kenneth Kalunian
Sandra Garces
Anca D Askanase
Elaine Karis
May Mo
Cassandra E Milmont
Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design
Lupus Science and Medicine
title Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design
title_full Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design
title_fullStr Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design
title_full_unstemmed Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design
title_short Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design
title_sort improving resource utilisation in sle drug development through innovative trial design
url https://lupus.bmj.com/content/10/2/e000890.full
work_keys_str_mv AT joantmerrill improvingresourceutilisationinsledrugdevelopmentthroughinnovativetrialdesign
AT kennethkalunian improvingresourceutilisationinsledrugdevelopmentthroughinnovativetrialdesign
AT sandragarces improvingresourceutilisationinsledrugdevelopmentthroughinnovativetrialdesign
AT ancadaskanase improvingresourceutilisationinsledrugdevelopmentthroughinnovativetrialdesign
AT elainekaris improvingresourceutilisationinsledrugdevelopmentthroughinnovativetrialdesign
AT maymo improvingresourceutilisationinsledrugdevelopmentthroughinnovativetrialdesign
AT cassandraemilmont improvingresourceutilisationinsledrugdevelopmentthroughinnovativetrialdesign