Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data.
In this study, we address the question whether (and to what extent, respectively) altmetrics are related to the scientific quality of papers (as measured by peer assessments). Only a few studies have previously investigated the relationship between altmetrics and assessments by peers. In the first s...
Main Authors: | Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5965816?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Library and Information Science Papers Discussed on Twitter: A new Network-based Approach for Measuring Public Attention
by: Haunschild Robin, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Are papers addressing certain diseases perceived where these diseases are prevalent? The proposal to use Twitter data as social-spatial sensors.
by: Lutz Bornmann, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases
by: Lutz Bornmann, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
Networks of reader and country status: an analysis of Mendeley reader statistics
by: Robin Haunschild, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01) -
How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data.
by: Lutz Bornmann, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)