Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax -Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate – skeletal and dental outcomes
Abstract Background Protraction of maxilla is usually the preferred and more commonly used treatment approach for skeletal Class III with a retrognathic maxilla. The aim of this study was the comparison of the skeletal and dental effects of two skeletally borne appliances for maxillary protraction:...
Main Authors: | Jan H. Willmann, Manuel Nienkemper, Nour Eldin Tarraf, Benedict Wilmes, Dieter Drescher |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Progress in Orthodontics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0239-8 |
Similar Items
-
The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study
by: Katyal Vandana, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of hybrid rapid maxillary expansion and facemask treatment in growing skeletal Class III patients: a retrospective follow-up study
by: Giuliano B. Maino, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial
by: Ricardo Alves de Souza, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Cephalometric Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effects of Modified Facemask
by: Amjad Al Taki, et al.
Published: (2006-12-01) -
A comparative evaluation of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes with skeletal anchored and conventional facemask protraction therapy
by: Tulika Tripathi, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)