Differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef-based seaweed farming.

As the global demand for seaweed-derived products drives the expansion of seaweed farming onto shallow coral ecosystems, the effects of farms on fish assemblages remain largely unexplored. Shallow coral reefs provide food and shelter for highly diverse fish assemblages but are increasingly modified...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E James Hehre, J J Meeuwig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118838
_version_ 1818986658029109248
author E James Hehre
J J Meeuwig
author_facet E James Hehre
J J Meeuwig
author_sort E James Hehre
collection DOAJ
description As the global demand for seaweed-derived products drives the expansion of seaweed farming onto shallow coral ecosystems, the effects of farms on fish assemblages remain largely unexplored. Shallow coral reefs provide food and shelter for highly diverse fish assemblages but are increasingly modified by anthropogenic activities. We hypothesized that the introduction of seaweed farms into degraded shallow coral reefs had potential to generate ecological benefits for fish by adding structural complexity and a possible food source. We conducted 210 transects at 14 locations, with sampling stratified across seaweed farms and sites adjacent to and distant from farms. At a seascape scale, locations were classified by their level of exposure to human disturbance. We compared sites where (1) marine protected areas (MPAs) were established, (2) neither MPAs nor blast fishing was present (hence "unprotected"), and (3) blast fishing occurred. We observed 80,186 fish representing 148 species from 38 families. The negative effects of seaweed farms on fish assemblages appeared stronger in the absence of blast fishing and were strongest when MPAs were present, likely reflecting the positive influence of the MPAs on fish within them. Species differentiating fish assemblages with respect to seaweed farming and disturbance were typically small but also included two key target species. The propensity for seaweed farms to increase fish diversity, abundance, and biomass is limited and may reduce MPA benefits. We suggest that careful consideration be given to the placement of seaweed farms relative to MPAs.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T18:54:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2fe20581b28843f39faac18980e2ccb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T18:54:17Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2fe20581b28843f39faac18980e2ccb52022-12-21T19:29:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e011883810.1371/journal.pone.0118838Differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef-based seaweed farming.E James HehreJ J MeeuwigAs the global demand for seaweed-derived products drives the expansion of seaweed farming onto shallow coral ecosystems, the effects of farms on fish assemblages remain largely unexplored. Shallow coral reefs provide food and shelter for highly diverse fish assemblages but are increasingly modified by anthropogenic activities. We hypothesized that the introduction of seaweed farms into degraded shallow coral reefs had potential to generate ecological benefits for fish by adding structural complexity and a possible food source. We conducted 210 transects at 14 locations, with sampling stratified across seaweed farms and sites adjacent to and distant from farms. At a seascape scale, locations were classified by their level of exposure to human disturbance. We compared sites where (1) marine protected areas (MPAs) were established, (2) neither MPAs nor blast fishing was present (hence "unprotected"), and (3) blast fishing occurred. We observed 80,186 fish representing 148 species from 38 families. The negative effects of seaweed farms on fish assemblages appeared stronger in the absence of blast fishing and were strongest when MPAs were present, likely reflecting the positive influence of the MPAs on fish within them. Species differentiating fish assemblages with respect to seaweed farming and disturbance were typically small but also included two key target species. The propensity for seaweed farms to increase fish diversity, abundance, and biomass is limited and may reduce MPA benefits. We suggest that careful consideration be given to the placement of seaweed farms relative to MPAs.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118838
spellingShingle E James Hehre
J J Meeuwig
Differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef-based seaweed farming.
PLoS ONE
title Differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef-based seaweed farming.
title_full Differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef-based seaweed farming.
title_fullStr Differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef-based seaweed farming.
title_full_unstemmed Differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef-based seaweed farming.
title_short Differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef-based seaweed farming.
title_sort differential response of fish assemblages to coral reef based seaweed farming
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118838
work_keys_str_mv AT ejameshehre differentialresponseoffishassemblagestocoralreefbasedseaweedfarming
AT jjmeeuwig differentialresponseoffishassemblagestocoralreefbasedseaweedfarming