Clock Face Drawing Test Performance in Children with ADHD

Introduction: The utility and discriminatory pattern of the clock face drawing test in ADHD is unclear. This study therefore compared Clock Face Drawing test performance in children with ADHD and controls.   Material & methods: 95 children with ADHD and 191 school children were matched for g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad Ghanizadeh, Salar Safavi, Michael Berk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2013-01-01
Series:Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bcn.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-140&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1827333083138883584
author Ahmad Ghanizadeh
Salar Safavi
Michael Berk
author_facet Ahmad Ghanizadeh
Salar Safavi
Michael Berk
author_sort Ahmad Ghanizadeh
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The utility and discriminatory pattern of the clock face drawing test in ADHD is unclear. This study therefore compared Clock Face Drawing test performance in children with ADHD and controls.   Material & methods: 95 children with ADHD and 191 school children were matched for gender ratio and age. ADHD symptoms severities were assessed using DSM-IV ADHD checklist and their intellectual functioning was assessed. The participants completed three clock-drawing tasks, and the following four functions were assessed: Contour score, Numbers score, Hands setting score, and Center score    Results: All the subscales scores of the three clock drawing tests of the ADHD group were lower than that of the control group. In ADHD children, inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity scores were not related with free drawn clock test scores. When pre-drawn contour test was performed, inattentiveness score was statistically associated with Number score. None of the other variables of age, gender, intellectual functioning, and hand use preference were associated with Numbers score. In pre-drawn clock, no association of ADHD symptoms with any CDT subscales was significant. In addition, more errors are observed with free drawn clock and Pre-drawn contour than pre-drawn clock.    Conclusion: Putting Numbers and Hands setting are more sensitive measures to screen ADHD than Contour and Center drawing. Test performance, except Hands setting, may have already reached a developmental plateau. It is probable that Hand setting deficit in children with ADHD may not decrease from age 8 to 14 years. Performance of children with ADHD is associated with the complexity of CDT.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:14:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3002931806b449b6b55b9615dadbd82f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-126X
2228-7442
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:14:37Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-3002931806b449b6b55b9615dadbd82f2024-03-02T23:28:20ZengIran University of Medical SciencesBasic and Clinical Neuroscience2008-126X2228-74422013-01-01411314Clock Face Drawing Test Performance in Children with ADHDAhmad GhanizadehSalar SafaviMichael BerkIntroduction: The utility and discriminatory pattern of the clock face drawing test in ADHD is unclear. This study therefore compared Clock Face Drawing test performance in children with ADHD and controls.   Material & methods: 95 children with ADHD and 191 school children were matched for gender ratio and age. ADHD symptoms severities were assessed using DSM-IV ADHD checklist and their intellectual functioning was assessed. The participants completed three clock-drawing tasks, and the following four functions were assessed: Contour score, Numbers score, Hands setting score, and Center score    Results: All the subscales scores of the three clock drawing tests of the ADHD group were lower than that of the control group. In ADHD children, inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity scores were not related with free drawn clock test scores. When pre-drawn contour test was performed, inattentiveness score was statistically associated with Number score. None of the other variables of age, gender, intellectual functioning, and hand use preference were associated with Numbers score. In pre-drawn clock, no association of ADHD symptoms with any CDT subscales was significant. In addition, more errors are observed with free drawn clock and Pre-drawn contour than pre-drawn clock.    Conclusion: Putting Numbers and Hands setting are more sensitive measures to screen ADHD than Contour and Center drawing. Test performance, except Hands setting, may have already reached a developmental plateau. It is probable that Hand setting deficit in children with ADHD may not decrease from age 8 to 14 years. Performance of children with ADHD is associated with the complexity of CDT.http://bcn.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-140&slc_lang=en&sid=1Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityClock face drawing testdiagnosispsychometricsassessment.
spellingShingle Ahmad Ghanizadeh
Salar Safavi
Michael Berk
Clock Face Drawing Test Performance in Children with ADHD
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Clock face drawing test
diagnosis
psychometrics
assessment.
title Clock Face Drawing Test Performance in Children with ADHD
title_full Clock Face Drawing Test Performance in Children with ADHD
title_fullStr Clock Face Drawing Test Performance in Children with ADHD
title_full_unstemmed Clock Face Drawing Test Performance in Children with ADHD
title_short Clock Face Drawing Test Performance in Children with ADHD
title_sort clock face drawing test performance in children with adhd
topic Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Clock face drawing test
diagnosis
psychometrics
assessment.
url http://bcn.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-140&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadghanizadeh clockfacedrawingtestperformanceinchildrenwithadhd
AT salarsafavi clockfacedrawingtestperformanceinchildrenwithadhd
AT michaelberk clockfacedrawingtestperformanceinchildrenwithadhd