Assessing Regional Ecosystem Conditions Using Geospatial Techniques—A Review

Ecosystem conditions at the regional level are critical factors for environmental management, public awareness, and land use decision making. Regional ecosystem conditions may be examined from the perspectives of ecosystem health, vulnerability, and security, as well as other conceptual frameworks....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chunhua Zhang, Kelin Wang, Yuemin Yue, Xiangkun Qi, Mingyang Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/8/4101
_version_ 1797603484564979712
author Chunhua Zhang
Kelin Wang
Yuemin Yue
Xiangkun Qi
Mingyang Zhang
author_facet Chunhua Zhang
Kelin Wang
Yuemin Yue
Xiangkun Qi
Mingyang Zhang
author_sort Chunhua Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Ecosystem conditions at the regional level are critical factors for environmental management, public awareness, and land use decision making. Regional ecosystem conditions may be examined from the perspectives of ecosystem health, vulnerability, and security, as well as other conceptual frameworks. Vigor, organization, and resilience (VOR) and pressure–stress–response (PSR) are two commonly adopted conceptual models for indicator selection and organization. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is primarily used to determine model weights and indicator combinations. Although there have been many successful efforts in assessing regional ecosystems, they remain affected by a lack of spatially explicit data, weak integration of natural and human dimensions, and uncertain data quality and analyses. In the future, regional ecosystem condition assessments may be advanced by incorporating recent improvements in spatial big data and machine learning to create more operative indicators based on Earth observations and social metrics. The collaboration between ecologists, remote sensing scientists, data analysts, and scientists in other relevant disciplines is critical for the success of future assessments.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:32:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3005371841154b86a610a32c5d15ec4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:32:47Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-3005371841154b86a610a32c5d15ec4c2023-11-17T21:19:05ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-04-01238410110.3390/s23084101Assessing Regional Ecosystem Conditions Using Geospatial Techniques—A ReviewChunhua Zhang0Kelin Wang1Yuemin Yue2Xiangkun Qi3Mingyang Zhang4Department of Biology, Algoma University, Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A2G4, CanadaKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, ChinaKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, ChinaKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, ChinaKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, ChinaEcosystem conditions at the regional level are critical factors for environmental management, public awareness, and land use decision making. Regional ecosystem conditions may be examined from the perspectives of ecosystem health, vulnerability, and security, as well as other conceptual frameworks. Vigor, organization, and resilience (VOR) and pressure–stress–response (PSR) are two commonly adopted conceptual models for indicator selection and organization. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is primarily used to determine model weights and indicator combinations. Although there have been many successful efforts in assessing regional ecosystems, they remain affected by a lack of spatially explicit data, weak integration of natural and human dimensions, and uncertain data quality and analyses. In the future, regional ecosystem condition assessments may be advanced by incorporating recent improvements in spatial big data and machine learning to create more operative indicators based on Earth observations and social metrics. The collaboration between ecologists, remote sensing scientists, data analysts, and scientists in other relevant disciplines is critical for the success of future assessments.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/8/4101ecosystem conditionsregional assessmentlandscape patternremote sensingspatial big data
spellingShingle Chunhua Zhang
Kelin Wang
Yuemin Yue
Xiangkun Qi
Mingyang Zhang
Assessing Regional Ecosystem Conditions Using Geospatial Techniques—A Review
Sensors
ecosystem conditions
regional assessment
landscape pattern
remote sensing
spatial big data
title Assessing Regional Ecosystem Conditions Using Geospatial Techniques—A Review
title_full Assessing Regional Ecosystem Conditions Using Geospatial Techniques—A Review
title_fullStr Assessing Regional Ecosystem Conditions Using Geospatial Techniques—A Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Regional Ecosystem Conditions Using Geospatial Techniques—A Review
title_short Assessing Regional Ecosystem Conditions Using Geospatial Techniques—A Review
title_sort assessing regional ecosystem conditions using geospatial techniques a review
topic ecosystem conditions
regional assessment
landscape pattern
remote sensing
spatial big data
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/8/4101
work_keys_str_mv AT chunhuazhang assessingregionalecosystemconditionsusinggeospatialtechniquesareview
AT kelinwang assessingregionalecosystemconditionsusinggeospatialtechniquesareview
AT yueminyue assessingregionalecosystemconditionsusinggeospatialtechniquesareview
AT xiangkunqi assessingregionalecosystemconditionsusinggeospatialtechniquesareview
AT mingyangzhang assessingregionalecosystemconditionsusinggeospatialtechniquesareview