The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent Futures

This paper reviews and analyses a decarbonization policy called the Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) system developed by David Fleming. The TEQs system involves rationing fossil fuel energy use for a nation on the basis of either a contracting carbon emission budget or scarce fuel availability, or both...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel Alexander, Joshua Floyd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4304
_version_ 1827708725504245760
author Samuel Alexander
Joshua Floyd
author_facet Samuel Alexander
Joshua Floyd
author_sort Samuel Alexander
collection DOAJ
description This paper reviews and analyses a decarbonization policy called the Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) system developed by David Fleming. The TEQs system involves rationing fossil fuel energy use for a nation on the basis of either a contracting carbon emission budget or scarce fuel availability, or both simultaneously, distributing budgets equitably amongst energy-users. Entitlements can be traded to incentivize demand reduction and to maximize efficient use of the limited entitlements. We situate this analysis in the context of Joseph Tainter’s theory about the development and collapse of complex societies. Tainter argues that societies become more socio-politically and technologically ‘complex’ as they solve the problems they face and that such complexification drives increased energy use. For a society to sustain itself, therefore, it must secure the energy needed to solve the range of societal problems that emerge. However, what if, as a result of deep decarbonization, there is less energy available in the future not more? We argue that TEQs offers a practical means of managing energy descent futures. The policy can facilitate controlled reduction of socio-political complexity via processes of ‘voluntary simplification’ (the result being ‘degrowth’ or controlled contraction at the scale of the physical economy).
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:09:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-300a20a96c2b42adbd8247ad17a404dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:09:44Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-300a20a96c2b42adbd8247ad17a404dd2023-11-20T10:41:32ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-08-011317430410.3390/en13174304The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent FuturesSamuel Alexander0Joshua Floyd1Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaMelbourne Sustainable Society Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaThis paper reviews and analyses a decarbonization policy called the Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) system developed by David Fleming. The TEQs system involves rationing fossil fuel energy use for a nation on the basis of either a contracting carbon emission budget or scarce fuel availability, or both simultaneously, distributing budgets equitably amongst energy-users. Entitlements can be traded to incentivize demand reduction and to maximize efficient use of the limited entitlements. We situate this analysis in the context of Joseph Tainter’s theory about the development and collapse of complex societies. Tainter argues that societies become more socio-politically and technologically ‘complex’ as they solve the problems they face and that such complexification drives increased energy use. For a society to sustain itself, therefore, it must secure the energy needed to solve the range of societal problems that emerge. However, what if, as a result of deep decarbonization, there is less energy available in the future not more? We argue that TEQs offers a practical means of managing energy descent futures. The policy can facilitate controlled reduction of socio-political complexity via processes of ‘voluntary simplification’ (the result being ‘degrowth’ or controlled contraction at the scale of the physical economy).https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4304Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs)deep decarbonizationrenewable energypost-carboncarbon budgetepistemic humility
spellingShingle Samuel Alexander
Joshua Floyd
The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent Futures
Energies
Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs)
deep decarbonization
renewable energy
post-carbon
carbon budget
epistemic humility
title The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent Futures
title_full The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent Futures
title_fullStr The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent Futures
title_full_unstemmed The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent Futures
title_short The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent Futures
title_sort political economy of deep decarbonization tradable energy quotas for energy descent futures
topic Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs)
deep decarbonization
renewable energy
post-carbon
carbon budget
epistemic humility
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4304
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelalexander thepoliticaleconomyofdeepdecarbonizationtradableenergyquotasforenergydescentfutures
AT joshuafloyd thepoliticaleconomyofdeepdecarbonizationtradableenergyquotasforenergydescentfutures
AT samuelalexander politicaleconomyofdeepdecarbonizationtradableenergyquotasforenergydescentfutures
AT joshuafloyd politicaleconomyofdeepdecarbonizationtradableenergyquotasforenergydescentfutures