Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan

This survey was conducted in the Trongsa District of Bhutan to assess and document the depredation of livestock by wild predators, time, and seasonality of predation, estimate the economic value of livestock losses in three years (2019-2021), and assess farmers’ perception of livestock depredation....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonam Dorji Layrab, Kuenzang Rangdrel, Tshering Gyelpo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CV. Literasi Indonesia 2023-08-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.literacyinstitute.org/index.php/ijsei/article/view/974
_version_ 1797375370815602688
author Sonam Dorji Layrab
Kuenzang Rangdrel
Tshering Gyelpo
author_facet Sonam Dorji Layrab
Kuenzang Rangdrel
Tshering Gyelpo
author_sort Sonam Dorji Layrab
collection DOAJ
description This survey was conducted in the Trongsa District of Bhutan to assess and document the depredation of livestock by wild predators, time, and seasonality of predation, estimate the economic value of livestock losses in three years (2019-2021), and assess farmers’ perception of livestock depredation. A survey using a semi-structured questionnaire was done with 218 farming households from five subdistricts of Trongsa, Bhutan. From a total of 683 livestock kills recorded, the tiger (69.69%) killed more than the dhole (14.4%), leopard (13.7%), and bear (1.4%) in the last three years. Adult cattle (milch, Dry & Bull) were more vulnerable (n=496) compared to young (calf & heifer) cattle (n=169). The majority of predation was in summer (51.18%) and winter (23.62%) whereas the rests (25.19%) were believed to have occurred irrespective of seasons. The total loss of 683 livestock head was valued at 380,739.13$ of which the majority were cattle (n= 665, 345,219.69$) followed by yak (n=48, 35,032.87$). Each household on average lost approximately 23.8% of the annual household cash income in the last three years and only 13% (n=30) received some form of compensation. The majority of respondents (96.8%) attribute a current increase in depredation cases to wildlife conservation efforts such as strict conservation laws, protected areas, and biological corridors. We recommend livestock intensification programs such as pasture improvements in fallow lands and financial compensations for the loss of improved breeds as short-term measures. We recommend for enhanced discussion on livestock insurance schemes and involve farmers in managing human-wildlife conflicts.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:23:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-30164bfc7535495f872a782a511654b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2722-1369
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:23:18Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher CV. Literasi Indonesia
record_format Article
series Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues
spelling doaj.art-30164bfc7535495f872a782a511654b02023-12-26T13:48:26ZengCV. Literasi IndonesiaIndonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues2722-13692023-08-014219220110.47540/ijsei.v4i2.974975Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, BhutanSonam Dorji Layrab0Kuenzang Rangdrel1Tshering Gyelpo2College of Natural Resources, BhutanDepartment of Animal Science, Royal University of Bhutan, BhutanDepartment of Animal Science, Royal University of Bhutan, BhutanThis survey was conducted in the Trongsa District of Bhutan to assess and document the depredation of livestock by wild predators, time, and seasonality of predation, estimate the economic value of livestock losses in three years (2019-2021), and assess farmers’ perception of livestock depredation. A survey using a semi-structured questionnaire was done with 218 farming households from five subdistricts of Trongsa, Bhutan. From a total of 683 livestock kills recorded, the tiger (69.69%) killed more than the dhole (14.4%), leopard (13.7%), and bear (1.4%) in the last three years. Adult cattle (milch, Dry & Bull) were more vulnerable (n=496) compared to young (calf & heifer) cattle (n=169). The majority of predation was in summer (51.18%) and winter (23.62%) whereas the rests (25.19%) were believed to have occurred irrespective of seasons. The total loss of 683 livestock head was valued at 380,739.13$ of which the majority were cattle (n= 665, 345,219.69$) followed by yak (n=48, 35,032.87$). Each household on average lost approximately 23.8% of the annual household cash income in the last three years and only 13% (n=30) received some form of compensation. The majority of respondents (96.8%) attribute a current increase in depredation cases to wildlife conservation efforts such as strict conservation laws, protected areas, and biological corridors. We recommend livestock intensification programs such as pasture improvements in fallow lands and financial compensations for the loss of improved breeds as short-term measures. We recommend for enhanced discussion on livestock insurance schemes and involve farmers in managing human-wildlife conflicts.https://ojs.literacyinstitute.org/index.php/ijsei/article/view/974conservationdepredationlivelihoodslivestock
spellingShingle Sonam Dorji Layrab
Kuenzang Rangdrel
Tshering Gyelpo
Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan
Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues
conservation
depredation
livelihoods
livestock
title Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan
title_full Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan
title_fullStr Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan
title_full_unstemmed Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan
title_short Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan
title_sort livestock depredation and its impact on farmers in trongsa district bhutan
topic conservation
depredation
livelihoods
livestock
url https://ojs.literacyinstitute.org/index.php/ijsei/article/view/974
work_keys_str_mv AT sonamdorjilayrab livestockdepredationanditsimpactonfarmersintrongsadistrictbhutan
AT kuenzangrangdrel livestockdepredationanditsimpactonfarmersintrongsadistrictbhutan
AT tsheringgyelpo livestockdepredationanditsimpactonfarmersintrongsadistrictbhutan