Looking at Ankara from Strasbourg: An Empirical Assessment of MEPs' Voting on and Framing of Turkey

this article examines the way in which the Members of the European Parliament (MEPS) frame Turkey and how this affects their voting stance towards Ankara in the parliamentary debates. Recent studies (Baldwin and Widgrén 2005; Braghiroli 2012; Canan-Sokullu 2011) have demonstrated that the debate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefano Braghiroli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Euro-Mediterranean University 2013-12-01
Series:International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.emuni.si/press/ISSN/1855-3362/6_003-022.pdf
Description
Summary:this article examines the way in which the Members of the European Parliament (MEPS) frame Turkey and how this affects their voting stance towards Ankara in the parliamentary debates. Recent studies (Baldwin and Widgrén 2005; Braghiroli 2012; Canan-Sokullu 2011) have demonstrated that the debate on Turkey’s European Union (EU) membership produces a very divisive impact on the voting dynamics and voting alignments in the European Parliament (EP) in the light of its national and political significance. The parliamentary positions on the ‘Turkey discourse’ range from enthusiastic support to open Turkophobia. What is even more striking is the wide variety of individual positions generally identifiable within the same political/ideological area. To what extent are meps’ different perceptions and representations of Turkey reflected in the way they vote when Turkey is at stake in the EP? And, what is the impact of this state of things on groups’ internal cohesion? This study addresses these two fundamental questions using two different sources of data. Elite survey data is used in order to capture MEPS’ perceptions of Turkey, while meps’ voting behavior is assessed in the light of the expressed votes.
ISSN:1855-3362