Geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia– posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries

Abstract Background The aim of this analysis is to determine geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilator settings and outcome in patients receiving general anesthesia for surgery. Methods Posthoc analysis of a worldwide study in 29 countries. Lower and upper middle–income countries (LMIC and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liselotte Hol, Sunny G. L. H. Nijbroek, Ary Serpa Neto, Sabrine N. T. Hemmes, Goran Hedenstierna, Michael Hiesmayr, Markus W. Hollmann, Gary H. Mills, Marcos F. Vidal Melo, Christian Putensen, Werner Schmid, Paolo Severgnini, Hermann Wrigge, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Paolo Pelosi, Marcus J. Schultz, for the LAS VEGAS study–investigators
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01560-x
_version_ 1818750314376855552
author Liselotte Hol
Sunny G. L. H. Nijbroek
Ary Serpa Neto
Sabrine N. T. Hemmes
Goran Hedenstierna
Michael Hiesmayr
Markus W. Hollmann
Gary H. Mills
Marcos F. Vidal Melo
Christian Putensen
Werner Schmid
Paolo Severgnini
Hermann Wrigge
Marcelo Gama de Abreu
Paolo Pelosi
Marcus J. Schultz
for the LAS VEGAS study–investigators
author_facet Liselotte Hol
Sunny G. L. H. Nijbroek
Ary Serpa Neto
Sabrine N. T. Hemmes
Goran Hedenstierna
Michael Hiesmayr
Markus W. Hollmann
Gary H. Mills
Marcos F. Vidal Melo
Christian Putensen
Werner Schmid
Paolo Severgnini
Hermann Wrigge
Marcelo Gama de Abreu
Paolo Pelosi
Marcus J. Schultz
for the LAS VEGAS study–investigators
author_sort Liselotte Hol
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The aim of this analysis is to determine geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilator settings and outcome in patients receiving general anesthesia for surgery. Methods Posthoc analysis of a worldwide study in 29 countries. Lower and upper middle–income countries (LMIC and UMIC), and high–income countries (HIC) were compared. The coprimary endpoint was the risk for and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC); secondary endpoints were intraoperative ventilator settings, intraoperative complications, hospital stay and mortality. Results Of 9864 patients, 4% originated from LMIC, 11% from UMIC and 85% from HIC. The ARISCAT score was 17.5 [15.0–26.0] in LMIC, 16.0 [3.0–27.0] in UMIC and 15.0 [3.0–26.0] in HIC (P = .003). The incidence of PPC was 9.0% in LMIC, 3.2% in UMIC and 2.5% in HIC (P < .001). Median tidal volume in ml kg− 1 predicted bodyweight (PBW) was 8.6 [7.7–9.7] in LMIC, 8.4 [7.6–9.5] in UMIC and 8.1 [7.2–9.1] in HIC (P < .001). Median positive end–expiratory pressure in cmH2O was 3.3 [2.0–5.0]) in LMIC, 4.0 [3.0–5.0] in UMIC and 5.0 [3.0–5.0] in HIC (P < .001). Median driving pressure in cmH2O was 14.0 [11.5–18.0] in LMIC, 13.5 [11.0–16.0] in UMIC and 12.0 [10.0–15.0] in HIC (P < .001). Median fraction of inspired oxygen in % was 75 [50–80] in LMIC, 50 [50–63] in UMIC and 53 [45–70] in HIC (P < .001). Intraoperative complications occurred in 25.9% in LMIC, in 18.7% in UMIC and in 37.1% in HIC (P < .001). Hospital mortality was 0.0% in LMIC, 1.3% in UMIC and 0.6% in HIC (P = .009). Conclusion The risk for and incidence of PPC is higher in LMIC than in UMIC and HIC. Ventilation management could be improved in LMIC and UMIC. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT01601223.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T04:17:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-301ed13ab7f04c07b338082220b13d28
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2253
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T04:17:42Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-301ed13ab7f04c07b338082220b13d282022-12-21T21:21:19ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532022-01-0122111110.1186/s12871-021-01560-xGeo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia– posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countriesLiselotte Hol0Sunny G. L. H. Nijbroek1Ary Serpa Neto2Sabrine N. T. Hemmes3Goran Hedenstierna4Michael Hiesmayr5Markus W. Hollmann6Gary H. Mills7Marcos F. Vidal Melo8Christian Putensen9Werner Schmid10Paolo Severgnini11Hermann Wrigge12Marcelo Gama de Abreu13Paolo Pelosi14Marcus J. Schultz15for the LAS VEGAS study–investigatorsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMCDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMCDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMCDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMCDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Uppsala UniversityDivision Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University ViennaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMCOperating Services, Critical Care and Anaesthesia, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield and University of SheffieldDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital BonnDivision Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University ViennaDepartment of Biotechnology and Life, ASST Sette Laghi Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazio Macchi, University of InsubriaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy, Bermannstrost Hospital HalleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University DresdenDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, Università degli Studi di GenovaDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMCAbstract Background The aim of this analysis is to determine geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilator settings and outcome in patients receiving general anesthesia for surgery. Methods Posthoc analysis of a worldwide study in 29 countries. Lower and upper middle–income countries (LMIC and UMIC), and high–income countries (HIC) were compared. The coprimary endpoint was the risk for and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC); secondary endpoints were intraoperative ventilator settings, intraoperative complications, hospital stay and mortality. Results Of 9864 patients, 4% originated from LMIC, 11% from UMIC and 85% from HIC. The ARISCAT score was 17.5 [15.0–26.0] in LMIC, 16.0 [3.0–27.0] in UMIC and 15.0 [3.0–26.0] in HIC (P = .003). The incidence of PPC was 9.0% in LMIC, 3.2% in UMIC and 2.5% in HIC (P < .001). Median tidal volume in ml kg− 1 predicted bodyweight (PBW) was 8.6 [7.7–9.7] in LMIC, 8.4 [7.6–9.5] in UMIC and 8.1 [7.2–9.1] in HIC (P < .001). Median positive end–expiratory pressure in cmH2O was 3.3 [2.0–5.0]) in LMIC, 4.0 [3.0–5.0] in UMIC and 5.0 [3.0–5.0] in HIC (P < .001). Median driving pressure in cmH2O was 14.0 [11.5–18.0] in LMIC, 13.5 [11.0–16.0] in UMIC and 12.0 [10.0–15.0] in HIC (P < .001). Median fraction of inspired oxygen in % was 75 [50–80] in LMIC, 50 [50–63] in UMIC and 53 [45–70] in HIC (P < .001). Intraoperative complications occurred in 25.9% in LMIC, in 18.7% in UMIC and in 37.1% in HIC (P < .001). Hospital mortality was 0.0% in LMIC, 1.3% in UMIC and 0.6% in HIC (P = .009). Conclusion The risk for and incidence of PPC is higher in LMIC than in UMIC and HIC. Ventilation management could be improved in LMIC and UMIC. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT01601223.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01560-xGeo–economic variationIntraoperative ventilationARISCAT scorePostoperative pulmonary complications, ventilation, intraoperative ventilationVentilator management
spellingShingle Liselotte Hol
Sunny G. L. H. Nijbroek
Ary Serpa Neto
Sabrine N. T. Hemmes
Goran Hedenstierna
Michael Hiesmayr
Markus W. Hollmann
Gary H. Mills
Marcos F. Vidal Melo
Christian Putensen
Werner Schmid
Paolo Severgnini
Hermann Wrigge
Marcelo Gama de Abreu
Paolo Pelosi
Marcus J. Schultz
for the LAS VEGAS study–investigators
Geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia– posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
BMC Anesthesiology
Geo–economic variation
Intraoperative ventilation
ARISCAT score
Postoperative pulmonary complications, ventilation, intraoperative ventilation
Ventilator management
title Geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia– posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
title_full Geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia– posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
title_fullStr Geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia– posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
title_full_unstemmed Geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia– posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
title_short Geo–economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia– posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
title_sort geo economic variations in epidemiology ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
topic Geo–economic variation
Intraoperative ventilation
ARISCAT score
Postoperative pulmonary complications, ventilation, intraoperative ventilation
Ventilator management
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01560-x
work_keys_str_mv AT liselottehol geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT sunnyglhnijbroek geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT aryserpaneto geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT sabrinenthemmes geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT goranhedenstierna geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT michaelhiesmayr geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT markuswhollmann geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT garyhmills geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT marcosfvidalmelo geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT christianputensen geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT wernerschmid geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT paolosevergnini geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT hermannwrigge geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT marcelogamadeabreu geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT paolopelosi geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT marcusjschultz geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries
AT forthelasvegasstudyinvestigators geoeconomicvariationsinepidemiologyventilationmanagementandoutcomeofpatientsreceivingintraoperativeventilationduringgeneralanesthesiaposthocanalysisofanobservationalstudyin29countries